HomeTopics › Sinusitis

Sinusitis

GMJ News knowledge hub · last reviewed September 2026 · Georgian Medical Journal

SummaryStatisticsGlossaryGMJ newsFAQDocumentsOrganizationsResearch

Rhinosinusitis — symptomatic inflammation of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses — is among the most common reasons for antibiotic prescription worldwide, yet the overwhelming majority of acute cases are viral and self-limiting, with the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis (EPOS 2020) making clear that antibiotics offer minimal benefit in acute rhinosinusitis and that intranasal corticosteroids, saline irrigation and analgesia are the appropriate first-line management, making this one of the single largest opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship in primary care (WHO). Chronic rhinosinusitis (symptoms beyond 12 weeks) is a distinct inflammatory disease rather than a persistent infection, subdivided by the presence or absence of nasal polyps, and its management has been transformed by type 2 inflammation-targeted biologics — dupilumab, omalizumab and mepolizumab — for severe polyp disease; while the clinician's critical task in acute presentations remains recognising the rare but devastating orbital and intracranial complications, where periorbital swelling, proptosis, diplopia, visual change, severe headache or altered consciousness demand emergency imaging rather than another antibiotic prescription.

Key messages

Most acute rhinosinusitis is viral — antibiotics offer minimal benefit
Acute rhinosinusitis is overwhelmingly viral and self-limiting. EPOS 2020 and Cochrane evidence are clear: antibiotics produce only a marginal improvement in symptom resolution, with a number needed to treat of around 15-18 for cure at 7-14 days, against a number needed to harm of around 8 for adverse effects. Given the sheer volume of sinusitis consultations globally, this is one of the largest single opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship in primary care. First-line management: intranasal corticosteroids, saline irrigation, analgesia and time.
Suspect bacterial infection using the double-worsening pattern, not colour of discharge
Purulent or coloured nasal discharge does NOT indicate bacterial infection — it reflects neutrophil myeloperoxidase and occurs routinely in viral illness. This misconception drives an enormous volume of unnecessary prescribing and must be corrected explicitly with patients. Features suggesting acute BACTERIAL rhinosinusitis (EPOS): symptoms persisting beyond 10 days without improvement; OR severe symptoms with fever above 38-39°C and purulent discharge or facial pain for 3-4 consecutive days at the start; OR — most specific — "double sickening": initial improvement followed by clear deterioration.
Orbital and intracranial complications are the emergency — image, do not re-prescribe
Rare but potentially devastating, and disproportionately affecting children and young adults. Orbital: periorbital or orbital cellulitis, subperiosteal abscess, orbital abscess, cavernous sinus thrombosis — signalled by periorbital swelling, proptosis, restricted or painful eye movements, diplopia, reduced visual acuity or colour vision, or a relative afferent pupillary defect. Intracranial: meningitis, epidural or subdural empyema, brain abscess, superior sagittal sinus thrombosis — signalled by severe headache, altered consciousness, focal neurology, seizures, or a swelling over the frontal bone (Pott's puffy tumour). These require emergency contrast CT or MRI, IV antibiotics and urgent ENT and ophthalmology or neurosurgical involvement — not another course of oral antibiotics.
Chronic rhinosinusitis is inflammatory disease, not persistent infection
CRS is defined by symptoms persisting beyond 12 weeks (nasal blockage or discharge, plus facial pain/pressure or reduction of smell) with objective evidence on endoscopy or CT. It is fundamentally an inflammatory disorder of the sinonasal mucosa, not a chronic infection — which is why repeated antibiotic courses are ineffective and inappropriate. Phenotyped by polyp status: CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP — typically type 2 inflammation, eosinophilic, associated with asthma and NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease) and CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). Mainstay treatment: long-term intranasal corticosteroids plus high-volume saline irrigation, with short courses of oral corticosteroids for polyp disease and endoscopic sinus surgery for treatment-refractory cases.
Biologics transformed severe nasal polyp disease
Type 2 inflammation-targeted biologics have changed the management of severe recurrent CRSwNP, particularly in patients with coexisting asthma who previously faced repeated surgery and recurrent oral steroid courses. Dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα, blocking IL-4 and IL-13 signalling; the SINUS-24 and SINUS-52 trials showed large reductions in polyp score, congestion and need for surgery and systemic steroids), omalizumab (anti-IgE) and mepolizumab (anti-IL-5) all have licensed indications in severe CRSwNP. These are adjuncts to, not replacements for, optimised topical therapy and appropriate surgery, and require specialist assessment and defined response criteria.
Recognise NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (Samter's triad)
The triad of nasal polyps, asthma and hypersensitivity to aspirin and other COX-1 inhibiting NSAIDs — driven by dysregulated arachidonic acid metabolism with cysteinyl leukotriene overproduction. Clinically vital because these patients: have particularly aggressive, rapidly recurring polyp disease with high revision surgery rates; may suffer severe bronchospasm from a single dose of aspirin or ibuprofen and must be explicitly warned; and benefit from specific interventions — leukotriene receptor antagonists, aspirin desensitisation followed by daily aspirin therapy in selected patients, and biologics. Always ask directly about aspirin and NSAID reactions in any patient with nasal polyps.

Key statistics

Viral
the great majority of acute rhinosinusitis — antibiotics give minimal benefit (EPOS 2020)
EPOS 2020/Cochrane
>10 days
without improvement, or "double sickening" — the pattern suggesting bacterial infection
EPOS 2020
Not colour
purulent discharge does NOT indicate bacterial infection — a major driver of overprescribing
EPOS/NICE
12 weeks
symptom duration defining chronic rhinosinusitis — an inflammatory, not infective, disease
EPOS 2020
Dupilumab
large reductions in polyp burden and need for surgery in severe CRSwNP (SINUS-24/52)
Lancet 2019
Eye signs
proptosis, diplopia or reduced vision = orbital complication = emergency imaging, not antibiotics
EPOS/AAO-HNS

Rhinosinusitis management — evidence for common interventions (EPOS 2020)

Source: EPOS 2020/Cochrane. Intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigation are first-line; antibiotics have marginal benefit in acute disease.

Glossary of key terms

EPOS 2020 definitions
ENT/Rhinology
The European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps is the international reference. Acute rhinosinusitis: sudden onset of two or more symptoms — one of which must be nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge (anterior or posterior drip) — plus/minus facial pain or pressure, plus/minus reduction or loss of smell; lasting less than 12 weeks. Recurrent acute rhinosinusitis: four or more episodes per year with complete resolution between. Chronic rhinosinusitis: the same symptom criteria persisting beyond 12 weeks, PLUS objective evidence — endoscopic signs (polyps, mucopurulent discharge from the middle meatus, mucosal oedema/obstruction) or CT changes (mucosal changes within the ostiomeatal complex or sinuses). The requirement for objective evidence matters: symptom criteria alone substantially over-diagnose CRS, and much "chronic sinusitis" is actually migraine or non-allergic rhinitis.
Facial pain — sinusitis is over-diagnosed
Differential diagnosis
Isolated facial pain or "sinus headache" without nasal obstruction, discharge or smell disturbance is very unlikely to be sinusitis, and this is one of the commonest diagnostic errors in primary care. The great majority of such patients have MIGRAINE — which characteristically produces mid-facial pain, nasal congestion and rhinorrhoea through trigeminal-autonomic activation, closely mimicking sinus disease, and which responds to triptans rather than antibiotics. Other mimics: tension-type headache; midfacial segment pain; trigeminal neuralgia; temporomandibular disorder; dental pathology; and cluster headache. A normal sinus CT in a patient with facial pain effectively excludes sinusitis as the cause, and a CT that is normal during an episode of pain is particularly informative.
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)
ENT surgery
Endoscopic surgery aims to restore ventilation and mucociliary drainage by opening the natural sinus ostia — principally the ostiomeatal complex — rather than stripping mucosa, and to create access for topical therapy to reach the sinus mucosa. Indicated for CRS failing optimised medical therapy (adequate-duration intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigation), complications of sinusitis, mucoceles, fungal disease, and to obtain tissue where neoplasm is suspected. Key principles: surgery is an adjunct that enables ongoing medical therapy, not a cure — patients who stop topical steroids after surgery relapse; and image-guided navigation is used for revision surgery and where anatomy is distorted. Major complications are rare but serious: orbital injury including blindness, CSF leak, and major haemorrhage.
Fungal rhinosinusitis
ENT/Infectious disease
A spectrum that must be distinguished because management diverges sharply. Non-invasive forms: fungal ball (usually maxillary, in immunocompetent patients — surgical removal is curative); allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (type 1 hypersensitivity to fungi, thick eosinophilic mucin with fungal hyphae, expansile disease often with bone remodelling in young atopic patients — treated by surgery plus corticosteroids, not antifungals). Invasive forms: chronic invasive; and acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis — a rapidly fatal emergency in the immunocompromised, particularly diabetic ketoacidosis, haematological malignancy, neutropenia and transplant patients. Warning signs of acute invasive disease: facial or palatal numbness, black necrotic eschar on the turbinate or palate, orbital or cranial nerve involvement, disproportionate pain. It requires immediate imaging, urgent surgical debridement and systemic antifungals — delay is measured in hours.
Antibiotic choice when genuinely indicated
Antimicrobial stewardship
When acute bacterial rhinosinusitis is genuinely indicated by the EPOS criteria, the usual pathogens are Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. First-line in most guidelines is amoxicillin, or amoxicillin-clavulanate where beta-lactamase-producing organisms are prevalent or the patient has recent antibiotic exposure, comorbidity or severe illness. Doxycycline is the usual alternative in penicillin allergy. Macrolides are avoided as first-line in many settings because of high pneumococcal resistance. Duration should be short — typically 5 days in adults where guidelines permit. Importantly, antibiotics have NO established role in uncomplicated chronic rhinosinusitis, where the disease process is inflammatory; long-term low-dose macrolide therapy is used in some specialist settings for CRSsNP with neutrophilic inflammation, but the evidence is inconsistent.
Intranasal corticosteroid technique
Practical therapeutics
The most common reason intranasal corticosteroids "fail" is technique, not drug choice — and correcting it is a high-value two-minute consultation. Key points: use the opposite hand to the nostril (right hand for left nostril), directing the spray outward toward the ipsilateral ear rather than straight back at the septum, which causes irritation, crusting, epistaxis and rarely septal perforation; do not sniff hard after spraying, as this deposits the drug in the nasopharynx where it is swallowed rather than on the nasal mucosa; and continue daily rather than as-needed, since maximal effect takes around two weeks of regular use. For chronic rhinosinusitis, high-volume saline irrigation with corticosteroid added to the irrigation solution delivers drug far more effectively to the sinus mucosa than sprays, particularly after sinus surgery has opened the ostia.

Latest GMJ coverage

White House Updates Food Pyramid to Reflect 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines
19/07/2026
High-Intensity Interval Training Alone Preserves Muscle While Reducing Fat in Older Adults
22/08/2026
How Vitamin D Becomes Active: The Three-Organ Pathway Explained
02/08/2026
Vitamin K’s Hidden Hierarchy: Why Your Body Prioritises Blood Clotting Over Bone Health
25/07/2026
Microplastics Found in Human Arterial Plaque Linked to Heart Attack and Stroke Risk
18/07/2026
Obinutuzumab Outperforms Tacrolimus for Primary Membranous Nephropathy
09/07/2026

Frequently asked questions 12 Q&A — structured for Google featured snippets and AI discovery

Knowledge hub: guidelines, conventions and reports

Organizations working in migration and health

Related health topics

Antibiotic stewardshipAsthma and united airway diseaseAllergic rhinitisMigraine mimicking sinus painInvasive fungal rhinosinusitisUpper respiratory infection prescribing

About this hub. Produced by the GMJ News Editorial Team as a public-good service. Every statistic is linked to its primary source. Documents are preserved in the GMJ Repository with full attribution. Georgian Medical Journal · Contact the editorial team
© 2026 GMJ News · PHIG · Sheni Network