HomeTopics › Tinnitus

Tinnitus

GMJ News knowledge hub · last reviewed September 2026 · Georgian Medical Journal

SummaryStatisticsGlossaryGMJ newsFAQDocumentsOrganizationsResearch

Tinnitus — the perception of sound in the absence of an external acoustic source — affects approximately 14% of adults worldwide, with around 2% experiencing it severely enough to substantially impair quality of life, sleep, concentration and mental health, and is generated not in the ear but in the central auditory pathways as a maladaptive response to reduced peripheral input — which is why it so commonly accompanies hearing loss and why treatments aimed at the ear alone usually fail (WHO). No drug has been shown to eliminate tinnitus, and patients are frequently told, wrongly and damagingly, that nothing can be done; in reality cognitive behavioural therapy has the strongest evidence base of any intervention for reducing tinnitus-related distress and disability, and hearing aids, sound enrichment and tinnitus retraining therapy all have a role — while pulsatile tinnitus, particularly if unilateral and synchronous with the pulse, is a fundamentally different symptom requiring vascular imaging to exclude dural arteriovenous fistula, carotid stenosis, glomus tumour or idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Key messages

~14% of adults — generated centrally, not in the ear
Tinnitus affects approximately 14% of adults worldwide, with around 2% experiencing it severely enough to substantially impair quality of life, sleep, concentration and mental health. Critically, the sound is generated in the CENTRAL auditory pathways, not the ear: reduced peripheral input (usually from cochlear hair cell loss) triggers maladaptive increases in central gain, aberrant neural synchrony and cross-modal reorganisation. This explains why treatments aimed at the ear alone usually fail, and why cutting the auditory nerve does not abolish tinnitus.
"Nothing can be done" is false and harmful — CBT has the strongest evidence
Patients are still routinely told nothing can be done, which is both inaccurate and damaging: it removes hope, prevents referral and worsens distress. No drug eliminates the tinnitus percept — but cognitive behavioural therapy has the strongest evidence base of any intervention for reducing tinnitus-related DISTRESS, disability and quality-of-life impact (Cochrane; NICE; multiple guidelines). The therapeutic target is the reaction to the sound, not the sound itself — and the reaction is what actually causes the suffering.
Pulsatile tinnitus is a different symptom requiring imaging
Pulsatile tinnitus — a rhythmic whooshing synchronous with the heartbeat — is NOT ordinary tinnitus and must not be managed with reassurance and sound therapy. It signals turbulent flow or a vascular abnormality and requires investigation, particularly if unilateral, objective (audible to the examiner), or associated with headache, visual symptoms or a bruit. Causes: dural arteriovenous fistula; carotid stenosis or dissection; glomus tympanicum or jugulare (paraganglioma — may be visible as a red retrotympanic mass); idiopathic intracranial hypertension (obese young women, headache, papilloedema); sigmoid sinus diverticulum or dehiscence; AVM. Investigation: MRI/MRA or CT angiography of the head and neck.
Hearing aids and sound enrichment treat the underlying deprivation
Because tinnitus arises from reduced auditory input, restoring input helps. Hearing aids in patients with coexisting hearing loss frequently reduce tinnitus prominence — both by amplifying environmental sound that masks it and by reducing the central gain that generated it. Sound enrichment (broadband noise, environmental sound, low-level music, bedside sound generators) reduces the contrast between the tinnitus and silence — hence the near-universal observation that tinnitus is worst in quiet rooms and at night. Total silence should be avoided. Cochlear implantation frequently reduces tinnitus in profoundly deaf patients.
Screen for hearing loss, mental health and sleep — not just the ear
Every patient with tinnitus needs: pure tone audiometry (coexisting hearing loss is present in the majority and is directly treatable); screening for depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation (tinnitus-related distress carries measurable psychological morbidity, and severe tinnitus is associated with increased suicide risk); and assessment of sleep, since insomnia both worsens and is worsened by tinnitus. Also review ototoxic and tinnitus-associated medication: aminoglycosides, cisplatin, loop diuretics, high-dose salicylates and quinine. Unilateral tinnitus with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss requires MRI to exclude vestibular schwannoma.
Noise exposure prevention is the main population-level lever
The dominant preventable cause of both hearing loss and tinnitus is noise — occupational (industry, construction, agriculture, military) and recreational (personal listening devices, concerts, motorsport, shooting). WHO estimates over one billion young people are at risk of avoidable hearing loss from unsafe listening practices, and has issued the WHO-ITU global standard for safe listening devices and the Make Listening Safe initiative. Hearing protection, sound level limits, exposure duration limits, and personal device volume monitoring are the interventions. Once hair cells are lost they do not regenerate in humans — prevention is the only cure currently available.

Key statistics

~14%
of adults worldwide experience tinnitus; ~2% severely
JAMA Neurol/WHO
CBT
strongest evidence of any intervention for tinnitus-related distress and disability
Cochrane/NICE
Pulsatile
tinnitus requires vascular imaging — a different symptom with treatable structural causes
AAO-HNS
>1 billion
young people at risk of avoidable hearing loss from unsafe listening practices
WHO
Asymmetric
unilateral tinnitus with asymmetric hearing loss requires MRI to exclude vestibular schwannoma
AAO-HNS/NICE
No drug
has been shown to eliminate tinnitus — guidelines advise against routine drug treatment
AAO-HNS/NICE

Tinnitus interventions — evidence for reducing distress and disability

Source: NICE/AAO-HNS/Cochrane. Interventions target the reaction and the underlying hearing loss, not the percept itself.

Glossary of key terms

Subjective vs objective tinnitus
Audiology/ENT
Subjective tinnitus (the vast majority): audible only to the patient; generated by central auditory pathway activity; typically associated with hearing loss; described as ringing, hissing, buzzing, whistling or cicada-like. Objective tinnitus (rare but important): a real acoustic phenomenon that can in principle be heard by the examiner with a stethoscope or Toynbee tube — caused by vascular turbulence (bruit, dural AV fistula, glomus tumour), or by muscular phenomena such as palatal myoclonus (rhythmic clicking from soft palate muscle contraction) or middle ear myoclonus (stapedius or tensor tympani). Objective tinnitus always warrants investigation and frequently has a specific, treatable cause.
Tinnitus Functional Index and THI
Outcome measurement
Validated questionnaires quantify tinnitus impact and are essential for tracking treatment response, since the loudness of the percept correlates poorly with the suffering it causes. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI, 25 items, 0-100): grades 1-5 from slight to catastrophic; widely used and translated. Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI, 25 items): designed specifically to be responsive to treatment change, with eight subscales (intrusiveness, sense of control, cognition, sleep, auditory, relaxation, quality of life, emotional). A reduction of around 13 points on the TFI is generally taken as clinically meaningful. Using a validated instrument at baseline and follow-up is the single most useful practical step in structuring tinnitus care.
Tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT)
Audiology
Based on Jastreboff's neurophysiological model, TRT combines: (1) directive counselling — a detailed explanation of the mechanism designed to reclassify the tinnitus signal as neutral rather than threatening, thereby breaking the limbic and autonomic reinforcement loop; and (2) sound therapy — continuous low-level broadband sound, set at a level that does not mask the tinnitus but reduces the contrast against silence, promoting habituation. Treatment is delivered over 12-24 months. Evidence is positive but methodologically weaker than for CBT, and the counselling component is likely to account for much of the effect. The core insight — that the distress is driven by the meaning attached to the sound, not the sound's acoustic properties — is clinically valuable regardless of the specific protocol used.
Somatosensory and somatic tinnitus
Neuro-otology
A substantial minority of patients can modulate the loudness or pitch of their tinnitus by jaw movement, neck movement, or firm pressure on the head, neck or jaw — somatic tinnitus. This reflects convergence of somatosensory input from the trigeminal and cervical systems onto the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Clinically important because it identifies patients in whom temporomandibular disorder or cervical spine dysfunction is contributing, and in whom treating that contributor (dental or TMD management, physiotherapy, postural correction) may improve the tinnitus. Always ask specifically whether jaw or neck movement changes the sound — patients rarely volunteer it.
Drugs and tinnitus
Pharmacology
Drug causes and associations to review in every patient: aminoglycosides (gentamicin, amikacin — cochleotoxic and vestibulotoxic, dose- and duration-related, may be irreversible); platinum chemotherapy (cisplatin especially — cumulative and permanent); loop diuretics at high dose or rapid infusion (usually reversible); high-dose salicylates and NSAIDs (classically reversible); quinine and chloroquine; macrolides at high dose. Conversely, no drug is licensed or recommended for tinnitus itself: guidelines (NICE, AAO-HNS) specifically advise AGAINST routine use of antidepressants, anticonvulsants, anxiolytics and betahistine for tinnitus alone. Antidepressants are indicated only where there is comorbid depression or anxiety, which should be treated on its own merits.
Hyperacusis and misophonia
Audiology
Frequently coexist with tinnitus and are commonly missed. Hyperacusis: abnormal intolerance of ordinary environmental sounds at levels comfortable to others, with genuine discomfort or pain — driven by increased central auditory gain. Management is sound desensitisation with graded exposure, NOT ear protection: routine use of earplugs in everyday quiet environments worsens hyperacusis by further increasing central gain, and this common self-management strategy must be actively discouraged (protection remains appropriate for genuinely loud exposure). Misophonia: strong emotional and autonomic reactions (anger, disgust, anxiety) to specific trigger sounds, often human-generated such as chewing or breathing — a distinct condition responding to CBT-based approaches rather than audiological treatment.

Latest GMJ coverage

Concussion History Linked to Higher Tinnitus Risk, Study Finds
20/08/2026

Frequently asked questions 12 Q&A — structured for Google featured snippets and AI discovery

Knowledge hub: guidelines, conventions and reports

Organizations working in migration and health

Related health topics

Hearing loss (usually coexisting)Noise-induced hearing damageTinnitus distress and moodInsomnia and tinnitusComorbid anxiety and depressionVestibular migraine overlap

About this hub. Produced by the GMJ News Editorial Team as a public-good service. Every statistic is linked to its primary source. Documents are preserved in the GMJ Repository with full attribution. Georgian Medical Journal · Contact the editorial team
© 2026 GMJ News · PHIG · Sheni Network