By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
GMJ NewsGMJ NewsGMJ News
  • Latest News
    • GMJ Briefs
  • Podcast & Media
    • Podcast Episodes
    • GMJ Audio
    • GMJ Videos
  • Research Digest
    • New Studies
    • Georgian Research
    • Data & Numbers
  • Policy & Systems
    • Health Policy
    • Quality & Safety
    • Migration & Health
    • Global Health
  • Practice
    • Clinical Updates
    • Case Discussions
    • Pharmacy & Prescribing
    • Ingredients A-Z
  • Perspectives
    • Editorial
    • Explainers
    • Voices
    • Letters
  • GMJ Articles
    • Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2026)
    • Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2026)
    • Pre-Launch Articles (2025)
  • Read the Journal →
  • About GMJ News
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
GMJ NewsGMJ News
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest News
    • GMJ Briefs
  • Podcast & Media
    • Podcast Episodes
    • GMJ Audio
    • GMJ Videos
  • Research Digest
    • New Studies
    • Georgian Research
    • Data & Numbers
  • Policy & Systems
    • Health Policy
    • Quality & Safety
    • Migration & Health
    • Global Health
  • Practice
    • Clinical Updates
    • Case Discussions
    • Pharmacy & Prescribing
    • Ingredients A-Z
  • Perspectives
    • Editorial
    • Explainers
    • Voices
    • Letters
  • GMJ Articles
    • Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2026)
    • Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2026)
    • Pre-Launch Articles (2025)
  • Read the Journal →
  • About GMJ News
Follow US
GMJ News > Practice > Clinical Updates > Medical Dosing Based on Race Lacks Scientific Evidence and May Harm Patients, NEJM Analysis Warns
Clinical UpdatesExplainersHealth PolicyPerspectivesPolicy & SystemsPractice

Medical Dosing Based on Race Lacks Scientific Evidence and May Harm Patients, NEJM Analysis Warns

GMJ
Last updated: 13/06/2026 10:46
By
GMJ Practice Desk
Share
6 Min Read
Medical professional reviewing medication dosing guidelines and genetic testing resultsBi-lingual Clinical Trial Consultation (45067326622).jpg by NIAID / CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)
New NEJM analysis challenges race-based medication dosing, arguing it lacks scientific foundation and may harm patients. Authors advocate for precision medicine approaches using genetic testing and biomarkers instead of racial categories. — Bi-lingual Clinical Trial Consultation (45067326622).jpg by NIAID / CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)
SHARE
🎧 Listen to this article5:32 min · 777 words · GMJ Audio
4 min read|777 words
✓ Medically reviewed by Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD · ORCID 0000-0001-7609-4515

🟠 Moderate Evidence

Contents
    • Key takeaways
      • Problems with Race-Based Medical Dosing
  • Scientific Foundation Under Question
  • Impact on Clinical Decision-Making
  • Alternative Approaches to Precision Medicine
  • Implications for Health Equity
    • What this means
  • Frequently asked questions
    • Why do current medical guidelines include race-based dosing recommendations?
    • How can doctors provide personalized medicine without using race?
    • What should patients do if their medication has race-based dosing recommendations?

A new analysis published in The New England Journal of Medicine challenges the widespread practice of adjusting medication dosages based on patient race, arguing that such approaches lack robust scientific foundation and may perpetuate health disparities. The perspective piece examines how racial categories in clinical practice often serve as poor proxies for the complex genetic, environmental, and social factors that truly influence drug response.

Key takeaways

  • Race-based dosing recommendations lack precision and may not reflect actual biological differences in drug metabolism
  • Genetic ancestry and self-identified race often correlate poorly with pharmacokinetic responses
  • Alternative approaches using specific biomarkers and pharmacogenetic testing could improve treatment precision
Multiple medications
currently have race-based dosing recommendations in clinical guidelines

Problems with Race-Based Medical Dosing

Key limitations identified in current clinical practice

Genetic oversimplification
High impact
Environmental factors ignored
Significant
Social determinants overlooked
Important
Individual variation

Highly variable

Source: NEJM Analysis, 2024 | Georgian Medical Journal News

Submit Your Paper
GMJ_Submit_Banner

Scientific Foundation Under Question

The NEJM analysis highlights fundamental problems with using race as a biological variable in medical dosing. Current practice often assumes that racial categories reflect meaningful genetic differences in drug metabolism, but growing evidence suggests this approach oversimplifies complex pharmacokinetic processes.

🎙️ Related Podcast Episodes
🎧 #54 | GMJ Podcast | The Blueprint of a Medical Journal: Designing an Open-Access Scientific Platform · 19m
🎧 #53 | GMJ Podcast | Palliative Care in Georgia — Health System Gaps, Access Barriers, and Policy Implications · 16m
🎧 #46 | GMJ Podcast | Angioplasty of Saphenous Vein Grafts — Risks, Outcomes, and Clinical Strategies · 21m
🎧 #45 | GMJ Podcast | Tskaltubo Mineral Baths in Osteoarthritis — Microcirculation, Erythrocytes, and Clinical Effects · 18m
🎧 #44 | GMJ Podcast | Infant Formula Contamination — Global Food Safety Failure and the Cereulide Outbreak · 21m

Research has shown that genetic variations affecting drug metabolism exist on a continuum across populations rather than clustering neatly within racial categories. The analysis points to examples where individuals within the same racial group show enormous variation in drug response, while some individuals from different racial backgrounds may have similar pharmacokinetic profiles.

Impact on Clinical Decision-Making

Clinicians frequently encounter dosing guidelines that recommend different starting doses or dose adjustments based on patient race, particularly for medications affecting cardiovascular, psychiatric, and pain management conditions. The FDA has approved labeling for several medications that include race-specific dosing recommendations.

However, the NEJM perspective argues that these recommendations may lead to suboptimal care. For more evidence-based approaches to clinical updates, see our Clinical Updates section. Patients may receive inappropriate doses that either fail to achieve therapeutic benefit or increase risk of adverse effects when race is used as a primary determinant of dosing strategy.

Alternative Approaches to Precision Medicine

The analysis advocates for more sophisticated approaches to personalized dosing that move beyond racial categories. Pharmacogenetic testing can identify specific genetic variants that directly influence drug metabolism, providing more precise guidance for dose selection.

Additionally, the authors suggest incorporating measures of kidney and liver function, body composition, and other physiological factors that directly affect drug disposition. These biomarker-based approaches could improve therapeutic outcomes while avoiding the problematic assumptions inherent in race-based dosing.

Implications for Health Equity

Beyond scientific concerns, the perspective raises important questions about how race-based dosing may perpetuate health disparities. When clinical guidelines embed racial assumptions, they may inadvertently reinforce biological explanations for health differences that actually stem from social and environmental factors.

The World Health Organization has increasingly emphasized the importance of addressing social determinants of health rather than attributing health differences primarily to biological factors. This analysis adds to growing calls for more nuanced approaches to precision medicine that account for the full complexity of factors influencing drug response.

Race-based dosing recommendations often lack the precision needed for optimal clinical care and may perpetuate unfounded biological assumptions about racial differences

— Analysis authors, NEJM perspective (2024)

What this means

For patients: Discuss with healthcare providers whether genetic testing or other biomarkers might provide better guidance for medication dosing than race alone
For clinicians: Consider moving beyond race-based dosing guidelines toward more precise biomarker-driven approaches when available
For policymakers: Support development of evidence-based dosing strategies that avoid oversimplified racial categorizations

Frequently asked questions

Why do current medical guidelines include race-based dosing recommendations?

Many guidelines incorporated racial categories as proxies for genetic differences when more precise testing methods were unavailable. However, advances in pharmacogenetics now offer more accurate approaches to personalized dosing.

How can doctors provide personalized medicine without using race?

Clinicians can use pharmacogenetic testing, kidney and liver function tests, body composition measurements, and other biomarkers that directly influence how the body processes medications.

What should patients do if their medication has race-based dosing recommendations?

Patients should discuss with their healthcare providers whether alternative approaches, such as genetic testing or closer monitoring, might provide more personalized and effective treatment.

The movement toward precision medicine offers opportunities to improve therapeutic outcomes while moving beyond problematic racial categorizations in clinical practice. As pharmacogenetic testing becomes more accessible and affordable, healthcare systems will need to develop new frameworks for implementing truly personalized dosing strategies. This transition represents both a scientific advancement and an important step toward more equitable medical care that recognizes the complex interplay of factors influencing individual drug responses.

Source: Prescription without Precision — Dangers of Dosing on the Basis of Race as Biology

Was this article helpful?

Disclaimer. This article is health journalism intended for general information and education. It is not medical advice and is not a substitute for professional diagnosis or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider about your individual circumstances. Full disclaimer →

Related Coverage

NHS Satisfaction Rises to 26% After Historic Low Despite Persistent Public ConcernsJun 14, 2026
Triple Hormone Obesity Drug Shows Promise in Early Safety Data at ADA 2026Jun 13, 2026
NEJM Images Show Advanced Diabetic Eye Disease Progression and Treatment ResponseJun 13, 2026
NHS workforce crisis threatens patient safety as early career doctors report severe burnoutJun 13, 2026
Related reference
  • Iron · Ingredient
  • SAMe · Ingredient
PG
Written by
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD
Editor-in-Chief, GMJ News
Full profile →
Medical disclaimer. This article is health journalism intended for general information. It is not medical advice and is not a substitute for consultation with a qualified healthcare professional. Always seek your physician's advice regarding any medical condition.
Medically reviewed by Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD. Spotted an error? Contact the editorial team.
Get the GMJ News digest
Evidence-based health journalism in your inbox. No spam; unsubscribe anytime.
TAGGED:clinical guidelinesdrug dosinghealth equitypharmacogeneticsprecision medicine
Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Copy Link Print
GMJ
ByGMJ Practice Desk
Follow:
GMJ Practice Desk is part of GMJ News, the newsroom of the Georgian Medical Journal (gmj.ge), published by the Public Health Institute of Georgia. Every article is editorially reviewed before publication.
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Submit Your Paper →

Georgia's peer-reviewed open-access medical journal. No APC until January 2027.
Submit Manuscript →
NHS Satisfaction Rises to 26% After Historic Low Despite Persistent Public Concerns

NHS satisfaction rose 6% to 26% in 2024 after historic lows, but…

Triple Hormone Obesity Drug Shows Promise in Early Safety Data at ADA 2026

Early safety data for triple hormone receptor obesity drugs presented at ADA…

NEJM Images Show Advanced Diabetic Eye Disease Progression and Treatment Response

New NEJM clinical images demonstrate proliferative diabetic retinopathy progression, showing characteristic neovascularization…

Submit Your Paper to GMJ

No APC until January 2027.
Submit Manuscript →

You Might Also Like

Map showing malaria prevention coverage across sub-Saharan African countries
New StudiesResearch Digest

Child Protection from Malaria Varies Dramatically Across Sub-Saharan Africa

By
GMJ Research Desk
24/05/2026
Medical illustration showing targeted cancer therapy mechanism
Clinical UpdatesNew StudiesPracticeResearch Digest

Savolitinib Shows Promise for MET-Amplified Gastric Cancer in Phase 2 Trial

By
GMJ Practice Desk
02/06/2026
Medical students participating in virtual residency interviews on computer screens
Clinical UpdatesPractice

Virtual vs In-Person Medical Residency Interviews Show No Difference in Outcomes, NEJM Study Finds

By
GMJ Practice Desk
11/06/2026
Healthcare provider conducting antenatal care consultation with pregnant woman
Global Health

Data reveal critical gaps in antenatal care quality across low-income countries

By
GMJ Policy Desk
21/05/2026
Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact US
  • GMJ Journal
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Editorial Team
  • Register at GMJ
  • Terms of Use

Subscribe to GMJ News — Click here

Join Community
© 2026 Georgian Medical Journal (GMJ). Published by the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG). All rights reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?

Not a member? Sign Up