From Tuberculosis › Chapter 5: Diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary tuberculosis in symptomatic adolescents and adults · Médecins Sans Frontières, Current online edition, 2026
Diagnostic pathway for pulmonary tuberculosis in symptomatic adolescents and adults, including rapid molecular testing and drug susceptibility.
- Issuer
- Médecins Sans Frontières
- Edition
- Current online edition, 2026
- Audience
- Clinicians and public health professionals managing tuberculosis in resource-limited settings
- Evidence
- Expert consensus based on MSF field experience
- Reviewed
- 21 Oct 2026 · GMJ
What this guideline says
GMJ summary
This MSF guidance section provides a step-by-step diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in adolescents (≥10 years) and adults presenting with symptoms. It emphasises the use of rapid molecular tests (RMTs) such as Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra as primary diagnostic tools, with specific guidance on when to repeat testing and how to interpret indeterminate or trace results.
The guidance distinguishes diagnostic approaches for people living with HIV (who should receive LF-LAM testing in addition to RMT) from those without HIV infection. It provides clear criteria for when second tests are needed, including error results, indeterminate rifampicin resistance, and negative results with high clinical suspicion. For Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra ‘trace’ results, specific interpretation rules apply based on HIV status, history of previous TB, and specimen type.
For patients with multidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB), the guidance mandates phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) when available to detect resistance to bedaquiline, linezolid and other drugs not covered by rapid molecular tests. The guidance also covers the role of chest X-ray findings and provides alternatives when RMTs are not immediately available.
Key points
For clinicians — doses and thresholds as stated in the guideline
- Adolescents are defined as patients aged 10 years or more for the purposes of this diagnostic algorithm.
- In people living with HIV, PTB symptoms include any of: current cough, fever, weight loss or night sweats; without HIV: cough for more than 2 weeks, haemoptysis, unexplained weight loss, night sweats or clinical suspicion.
- LF-LAM should only be performed in patients with HIV infection; an RMT must also be performed regardless of LF-LAM result.
- Repeat Xpert MTB/RIF on a new specimen if the result is error/invalid/no result, rifampicin resistance indeterminate, MTB not detected with high clinical suspicion, or rifampicin resistance detected in a low-risk patient.
- For Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 'trace' results: consider positive in HIV-positive patients, children and extrapulmonary specimens (do not repeat); cannot interpret in adults with TB history in previous 5 years (perform culture instead).
- If Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra shows 'trace' on two specimens, do not perform Xpert MTB/XDR; use pDST or another gDST instead.
- Chest X-ray findings suggestive of PTB include infiltrates in upper lobes and superior segments of lower lobes, cavities, consolidations, mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy, and miliary pattern.
- Perform pDST and NGS (if available) in all MDR/RR-TB patients to detect resistance to bedaquiline, linezolid and other drugs not tested by RMTs.
Clinical symptoms triggering PTB diagnostic algorithm
Table extracted from the guideline
| HIV status | Symptoms requiring investigation |
|---|---|
| HIV infection present | Any of: current cough, fever, weight loss, night sweats |
| No HIV infection | Any of: cough >2 weeks, cough with haemoptysis, unexplained weight loss, night sweats, clinical suspicion |
Source: Médecins Sans Frontières, Guidance for using diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary tuberculosis — MSF Tuberculosis. Reproduced in summary form.
From the guideline
Verbatim
“A pDST and, if available, a next generation sequencing (NGS) should be performed in all patients with MDR/RR-TB to detect potential resistance to bedaquiline, linezolid and other drugs not tested by RMTs.”
Editor’s perspective
Why this matters for Georgia and the region
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD
Editor-in-Chief, Georgian Medical Journal · Chair, Public Health Institute of Georgia · WHO consultant, health and migration
As Chair of the Public Health Institute of Georgia, I recognise that drug-resistant tuberculosis remains a critical challenge in our region, with Georgia among the countries with higher MDR-TB burdens in the WHO European Region. This MSF guidance provides practical clarity on the use of Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra technologies that are already deployed in Georgia's National Tuberculosis Programme, but I would particularly stress to Georgian clinicians the imperative to perform phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and next-generation sequencing for all MDR/RR-TB cases to detect resistance to newer agents like bedaquiline and linezolid—drugs that are essential components of our second-line regimens. The realistic implementation challenge is ensuring that rural and regional facilities have reliable specimen transport networks to reference laboratories, and that turnaround times for second-line DST results are short enough to inform treatment decisions without dangerous delays. Georgia's investment in laboratory capacity must continue to match our ambitions in TB elimination.
ORCID 0000-0001-7609-4515 · Perspective written for the GMJ Guidelines Library, 21 Oct 2026
Applicability
Georgia and the South Caucasus
Georgia has made substantial progress in tuberculosis control but continues to face challenges with drug-resistant TB, particularly in vulnerable populations. This MSF guidance is directly applicable to Georgian TB programmes, which already use Xpert MTB/RIF technology. The specific recommendations for people living with HIV are particularly relevant given the intersection of TB and HIV in Georgia. National programmes should ensure that capacity exists for second-line testing (pDST, NGS) for MDR/RR-TB cases, and that clinicians are trained in the nuanced interpretation of ‘trace’ results from Xpert Ultra. The guidance’s emphasis on rapid molecular diagnostics aligns with Georgia’s National Tuberculosis Programme priorities, though implementation in rural areas may require strengthening of specimen referral networks to reference laboratories.
Questions this guideline answers
Quick answers
When should I repeat an Xpert MTB/RIF test?
Repeat on a new specimen if the result shows error/invalid/no result, rifampicin resistance indeterminate, MTB not detected with high clinical suspicion, or rifampicin resistance detected in a patient at low risk of resistance (no previous rifampicin treatment, no contact with rifampicin-resistant case, from low-prevalence area).
How should I interpret an Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 'trace' result?
In HIV-positive patients, children and extrapulmonary specimens, 'trace' is considered positive and should not be repeated. In adults with TB history in the previous 5 years, 'trace' cannot be interpreted and culture should be performed. In other cases, repeat the test on a new specimen. No rifampicin resistance interpretation is possible with 'trace' results.
Should I use LF-LAM for all TB suspects?
No. LF-LAM should only be performed in patients with HIV infection. Regardless of the LF-LAM result, also perform an RMT because it has better sensitivity when LF-LAM is negative and can detect rifampicin resistance.
What additional testing is needed for MDR/RR-TB patients?
Perform phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) in all MDR/RR-TB patients, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) if available, to detect potential resistance to bedaquiline, linezolid and other drugs not tested by rapid molecular tests.
Related on GMJ
Interconnected resources
Dictionary of Public Health
Drugs A–Z
Conditions A–Z
Quality & accreditation
Same guideline
- Diagnostic approach — MSF TuberculosisChapter 4: Diagnosis of active tuberculosis in children
- Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis in Children: Introduction — MSF TuberculosisChapter 4: Diagnosis of active tuberculosis in children
- Other investigations — MSF TuberculosisChapter 3: Diagnosis and follow-up investigations
- Latent tuberculosis infection — MSF TuberculosisChapter 3: Diagnosis and follow-up investigations
- Active tuberculosis — MSF TuberculosisChapter 3: Diagnosis and follow-up investigations
- Summary of clinical presentations of tuberculosis — MSF TuberculosisChapter 2: Clinical presentation
Other guidelines on this topic
- Diagnostic approach — MSF Tuberculosis
- Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis in Children: Introduction — MSF Tuberculosis
- Major genital infections (summary) — Clinical guidelines — Diagnosis and treatment manual — MSF Clinical guidelines
- Venereal warts — MSF Clinical guidelines
- Other investigations — MSF Tuberculosis
- Issuer
- Médecins Sans Frontières
- Guideline
- Tuberculosis
- Chapter
- Chapter 5: Diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary tuberculosis in symptomatic adolescents and adults
- Type
- Clinical guideline (chapter)
- Edition
- Current online edition, 2026
- Status
- Current
- Published
- 2026-10-14
- Scope
- Diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary tuberculosis in symptomatic adolescents (≥10 years) and adults
- Audience
- Clinicians and public health professionals managing tuberculosis in resource-limited settings
- Evidence
- Expert consensus based on MSF field experience
- Record history
- Created 21 Oct 2026 · updated 21 Oct 2026 · next check Apr 2027
Médecins Sans Frontières. Guidance for using of diagnostic algorithm. In: Tuberculosis [guideline]. Paris: MSF; 2026. Section 5.1.GMJ Guidelines Library records are original summaries written by the GMJ editorial team from the issuer’s published document and reviewed by a physician. They do not replace the full guideline. The document is the copyright of its issuer and is linked, not hosted. Spotted an error or a newer edition? Tell the Guidelines Desk.
Was this article helpful?

