By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
GMJ NewsGMJ NewsGMJ News
  • Latest News
    • GMJ Briefs
  • Podcast & Media
    • Podcast Episodes
    • GMJ Audio
    • GMJ Videos
  • Research Digest
    • New Studies
    • Georgian Research
    • Data & Numbers
  • Policy & Systems
    • Health Policy
    • Quality & Safety
    • Migration & Health
    • Global Health
  • Practice
    • Clinical Updates
    • Case Discussions
    • Pharmacy & Prescribing
    • Ingredients A-Z
  • Perspectives
    • Editorial
    • Explainers
    • Voices
    • Letters
  • GMJ Articles
    • Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2026)
    • Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2026)
    • Pre-Launch Articles (2025)
  • Read the Journal →
  • About GMJ News
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
GMJ NewsGMJ News
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest News
    • GMJ Briefs
  • Podcast & Media
    • Podcast Episodes
    • GMJ Audio
    • GMJ Videos
  • Research Digest
    • New Studies
    • Georgian Research
    • Data & Numbers
  • Policy & Systems
    • Health Policy
    • Quality & Safety
    • Migration & Health
    • Global Health
  • Practice
    • Clinical Updates
    • Case Discussions
    • Pharmacy & Prescribing
    • Ingredients A-Z
  • Perspectives
    • Editorial
    • Explainers
    • Voices
    • Letters
  • GMJ Articles
    • Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2026)
    • Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2026)
    • Pre-Launch Articles (2025)
  • Read the Journal →
  • About GMJ News
Follow US
GMJ News > GMJ Briefs > Animal Health Receives 0.6% of Global Health Funding While Human Health Claims 95%

Animal Health Receives 0.6% of Global Health Funding While Human Health Claims 95%

GMJ
Last updated: 10/06/2026 23:55
By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
Share
1 Min Read
Infographic showing animal health funding represents tiny fraction of global health spending
Animal health receives just 0.6% of global health spending despite mounting disease crises that pose significant risks to human populations. A new WOAH report reveals critical funding gaps threatening pandemic preparedness. — Photo: Life In Lens / Pexels
SHARE
1 min read|123 words

According to the World Organisation for Animal Health’s 2024 global health spending analysis, animal health receives only 0.6% of total global health expenditure, revealing a stark funding disparity that undermines disease prevention efforts at their source. The distribution shows human health commanding 95% of spending, environmental health at 4%, and plant health at 2%, leaving animal health systems critically underfunded.

This allocation pattern is particularly troubling given the well-documented epidemiological evidence that three-quarters of emerging infectious diseases have animal origins. The funding gap directly correlates with weakened surveillance capabilities and inadequate response infrastructure, especially in regions where zoonotic disease risks are highest. Current surveillance systems remain insufficient to detect and contain animal diseases before they potentially spillover into human populations, creating a precarious situation for global health security.

Was this article helpful?

GMJ Brief · Key Finding

📰 Read the full article: Animal health receives just 0.6% of global health spending despite mounting disease crises →

Related reference
  • Iron · Ingredient
Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Copy Link Print
GMJ
ByProf. Giorgi Pkhakadze
Follow:
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD, is Editor-in-Chief of the Georgian Medical Journal and Chair of the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG). He is Professor and Head of the Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences at David Tvildiani Medical University, and Secretary/Treasurer of the UEMS Section of Public Health. ORCID: 0000-0001-7609-4515.

Submit Your Paper →

Georgia's peer-reviewed open-access medical journal. No APC until January 2027.
Submit Manuscript →
High Tyrosine Levels Linked to Reduced Life Expectancy in Men, Large Study Suggests

A large-scale epidemiological study has found that men with higher circulating levels…

Calcium and Vitamin D Supplements Show Limited Benefit for Fracture Prevention in Older Adults, Major Review Finds

A comprehensive systematic review of nearly 154,000 older adults challenges decades of…

Nasal spray reaches women’s brains differently across menstrual cycle, new study reveals

Research shows that nasal sprays penetrate women's brains at different rates depending…

Submit Your Paper to GMJ

No APC until January 2027.
Submit Manuscript →

You Might Also Like

PHEIC Declaration: Ebola Outbreak with Cross-Border Transmission DRC-Uganda

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
31/05/2026

SITUATION BRIEF: Ebola Outbreak – DRC/Uganda Cross-Border Transmission with WHO PHEIC Declaration

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
31/05/2026

EBOLA OUTBREAK – DRC/UGANDA CROSS-BORDER TRANSMISSION WITH WHO PHEIC DECLARATION

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
31/05/2026
Global HealthPolicy & Systems

WHO Declares International Emergency as Ebola Outbreak Crosses DRC-Uganda Border

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
31/05/2026
Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact US
  • GMJ Journal
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Editorial Team
  • Register at GMJ
  • Terms of Use

Subscribe to GMJ News — Click here

Join Community
© 2026 Georgian Medical Journal (GMJ). Published by the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG). All rights reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?

Not a member? Sign Up