🟠 Moderate Evidence
Pregnant women in Zika virus endemic regions want early, transparent communication about test results and pregnancy risks, even when medical uncertainty is high, according to a qualitative study published in BMJ Global Health. Researchers conducted in-depth interviews with 98 pregnant women across Brazil, Colombia, and Puerto Rico to understand their preferences for receiving information about emerging pathogen exposure during pregnancy.
Key takeaways
- 98 pregnant women across three countries preferred to receive test results and risk information as soon as possible, not delayed
- Women wanted separation of risk communication from treatment decisions to allow time for reflection and consultation
- Public health authorities should develop community-informed risk communication plans before epidemics of emerging infectious diseases occur
Study at a Glance
| Source | BMJ Global Health |
| Study type | Qualitative multicountry study |
| Sample size | N = 98 pregnant women |
| Population | Pregnant women in Zika-endemic regions during and after Zika outbreak |
| Countries | Brazil, Colombia, Puerto Rico (7 sites) |
Women’s Preferences for Risk Communication Timing
Thematic analysis of 98 pregnant women’s stated preferences across Brazil, Colombia, and Puerto Rico during Zika outbreak period
Source: BMJ Global Health Study Analysis | Georgian Medical Journal News
Timing Matters: Early Information Over Delayed Uncertainty
The research, which used thematic analysis of in-depth interviews, found a consistent and strong preference among women for receiving test results and risk assessments as early as possible during pregnancy, according to findings published in BMJ Global Health. This preference held across all three countries and time periods examined in the study, even when diagnostic certainty remained limited.
Women expressed that waiting for results or delayed communication created additional psychological burden during an already stressful period. The study notes that despite high levels of uncertainty in diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes, pregnant women actively wanted to engage with available information rather than be shielded from it.
See related coverage on Clinical Updates for guidance on communicating test results to patients during diagnostic uncertainty.
Separating Information From Decisions Protects Autonomy
A key finding from the qualitative analysis was women’s strong desire to receive risk information separately from recommendations about next steps, according to the published research. This separation allowed women time to process test results, understand the associated risks to their pregnancy or infant, and explore available services before being asked to make clinical or reproductive decisions.
The researchers found that women valued the opportunity to discuss results with partners, family members, or trusted advisors before committing to treatment pathways. This preference reflects an important principle in shared decision-making: that information comprehension and autonomous choice require temporal separation from action steps.
Public Health Must Prepare Community-Informed Risk Plans Before Outbreaks
The study concludes with a direct call to action for public health authorities and healthcare providers, as stated in the BMJ Global Health article: communication strategies for emerging pathogens suspected to affect pregnancy should be designed in advance through close engagement with affected communities. Rather than developing communication approaches in real time during epidemics, authorities should work with families to understand their preferences and co-create risk communication frameworks.
This approach is particularly important for emerging infectious diseases where diagnostic uncertainty, evolving scientific understanding, and limited evidence are unavoidable features of early outbreak response. For related policy discussions, see Health Policy coverage on Global Health preparedness.
Across all sites and time periods, women wanted to learn about their test results, the risk to their pregnancy or infant, and the related uncertainty as early as possible, and wanted to separate risk communication from decision-making around the following steps to give them time to consider the test results and available services.
— BMJ Global Health study findings from 98 pregnant women in Brazil, Colombia, and Puerto Rico
What this means
Frequently asked questions
Why did researchers study Zika virus specifically?
The Zika virus outbreak of 2015–2016 caused widespread concern about pregnancy outcomes due to suspected associations with congenital abnormalities, yet diagnostic certainty remained limited during the acute outbreak period. This created an ideal real-world setting to understand how pregnant women prefer to receive risk information when medical uncertainty is high and the potential consequences are serious.
What is thematic analysis and why was it used?
Thematic analysis is a qualitative research method for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within interview data. The researchers used a combined deductive and inductive approach, meaning they looked both for pre-defined concepts (such as timing preferences) and for novel themes that emerged from women’s own words. This method is particularly suited to understanding patient values and preferences.
Can these findings apply to other emerging infectious diseases?
While this research specifically examined Zika, the study’s conclusions suggest that the underlying principles—women wanting early information, time to process results, and separation of communication from decision-making—are likely relevant to other pregnancy-related emerging pathogen scenarios. However, community preferences may vary by cultural context and specific disease characteristics, so advance community engagement remains essential.
As emerging infectious diseases continue to pose unpredictable threats to maternal and fetal health globally, the integration of community preferences into public health communication planning will strengthen trust in health systems and support better health outcomes. The authors emphasize that the time to develop these partnerships is before the next outbreak, not during it.
Source: Community preferences for risk communication during pregnancy in the context of an emerging pathogen: a multicountry qualitative study, BMJ Global Health
Was this article helpful?
Related Coverage
