By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
GMJ NewsGMJ NewsGMJ News
  • Latest News
    • GMJ Briefs
  • Podcast & Media
    • Podcast Episodes
    • GMJ Audio
    • GMJ Videos
  • Research Digest
    • New Studies
    • Georgian Research
    • Data & Numbers
  • Policy & Systems
    • Health Policy
    • Quality & Safety
    • Migration & Health
    • Global Health
  • Practice
    • Clinical Updates
    • Case Discussions
    • Pharmacy & Prescribing
    • Ingredients A-Z
  • Perspectives
    • Editorial
    • Explainers
    • Voices
    • Letters
  • GMJ Articles
    • Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2026)
    • Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2026)
    • Pre-Launch Articles (2025)
  • Read the Journal →
  • About GMJ News
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
GMJ NewsGMJ News
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest News
    • GMJ Briefs
  • Podcast & Media
    • Podcast Episodes
    • GMJ Audio
    • GMJ Videos
  • Research Digest
    • New Studies
    • Georgian Research
    • Data & Numbers
  • Policy & Systems
    • Health Policy
    • Quality & Safety
    • Migration & Health
    • Global Health
  • Practice
    • Clinical Updates
    • Case Discussions
    • Pharmacy & Prescribing
    • Ingredients A-Z
  • Perspectives
    • Editorial
    • Explainers
    • Voices
    • Letters
  • GMJ Articles
    • Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2026)
    • Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2026)
    • Pre-Launch Articles (2025)
  • Read the Journal →
  • About GMJ News
Follow US
GMJ News > GMJ Briefs > Urgent Call for Legislative Reform as AI Liability Gap Widens Between Doctors and Tech Companies

Urgent Call for Legislative Reform as AI Liability Gap Widens Between Doctors and Tech Companies

GMJ
Last updated: 13/07/2026 14:06
By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
Share
1 Min Read
Medical professional using AI technology with legal scales representing liability concerns
Medical Protection Society warns doctors face full legal liability for AI tool errors while technology companies remain shielded from accountability. Current legislation creates impossible position for physicians using AI in healthcare. — Photo by Tara Winstead on Pexels (Pexels License)
SHARE
1 min read|153 words

A comprehensive report from the Medical Protection Society has exposed a critical disparity in legal responsibility for artificial intelligence use in healthcare. While physicians bear the full burden of liability for AI-generated medical decisions, technology companies remain largely shielded from accountability through existing legislative frameworks.

The report, titled “Closing the AI Liability Gap,” demonstrates that current regulations fail to classify AI systems as medical products, thereby exempting manufacturers from standard product liability requirements. This asymmetry creates an untenable situation where healthcare providers assume all legal risk while tech developers face minimal consequences for algorithmic errors or system failures.

Medical professionals now confront a double-bind scenario: they face potential negligence claims whether they follow or reject AI recommendations. The Medical Protection Society warns that this regulatory vacuum threatens both patient safety and the sustainable integration of beneficial AI technologies in clinical practice, necessitating urgent legislative intervention to establish equitable liability distribution across all stakeholders.

Was this article helpful?

GMJ Brief · Announcement

📰 Read the full article: Doctors Face Legal Risk from AI Tools While Companies Escape Liability, Medical Defence Report Warns →

Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Copy Link Print
GMJ
ByProf. Giorgi Pkhakadze
Follow:
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD, is Editor-in-Chief of the Georgian Medical Journal and Chair of the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG). He is Professor and Head of the Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences at David Tvildiani Medical University, and Secretary/Treasurer of the UEMS Section of Public Health. ORCID: 0000-0001-7609-4515.

Submit Your Paper →

Georgia's peer-reviewed open-access medical journal. No APC until January 2027.
Submit Manuscript →
Sleep Quality Drives Daily Movement More Than Exercise Boosts Rest, 2025 Data Shows

Wearable data from 71,000 adults over 3.5 years reveal that sleep quality…

Taurine and Cancer: Separating Laboratory Findings from Dietary Risk

Recent headlines claimed taurine fuels cancer, but a Nature study of leukemia…

Sleep deprivation damages multiple body systems simultaneously, six controlled studies show

Six controlled studies show that sleep deprivation simultaneously disrupts hormonal regulation, metabolic…

Submit Your Paper to GMJ

No APC until January 2027.
Submit Manuscript →

You Might Also Like

Healthcare workers reviewing Chagas disease surveillance data in Latin American clinic

Three Critical Weaknesses in Chagas Disease Surveillance: What Healthcare Systems Must Address

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
08/07/2026

PHEIC Declaration: Ebola Cross-Border Transmission DRC-Uganda

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
31/05/2026
MHRA medical device exceptional use authorisations registry documentation

What Healthcare Providers Should Know About MHRA’s Exceptional Use Authorisation Registry

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
17/07/2026
WHO Emergency Committee meeting on Ebola Bundibugyo outbreak response

Record Speed: WHO Issues PHEIC Declaration for Ebola Bundibugyo in 13 Days

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
07/06/2026
Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact US
  • GMJ Journal
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Editorial Team
  • Register at GMJ
  • Terms of Use

Subscribe to GMJ News — Click here

Join Community
© 2026 Georgian Medical Journal (GMJ). Published by the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG). All rights reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?

Not a member? Sign Up