National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK) · Updated September 2026 (originally published November 2025, replacing NG51 from 2016)
NICE clinical guideline on recognising, risk-stratifying and treating suspected sepsis in adults and young people aged ≥16 using NEWS2.
- Issuer
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK)
- Edition
- Updated September 2026 (originally published November 2025, replacing NG51 from 2016)
- Audience
- All healthcare professionals involved in assessing and managing people with suspected sepsis: GPs, emergency department staff, hospital doctors and nurses, ambulance crews, community and custodial healthcare staff, acute mental health setting staff
- Evidence
- Systematic reviews of diagnostic and prognostic studies, RCTs and observational studies; GRADE assessment; formal consensus for areas without direct evidence; updated 2024–2026 with new evidence reviews on NEWS2 stratification, antibiotics, fluids, vasopressors, hypoperfusion indicators, rapid tests, risk factors and procalcitonin
- Reviewed
- 23 Oct 2026 · GMJ
What this guideline says
GMJ summary
This NICE guideline (NG253, November 2025, updated September 2026) provides comprehensive recommendations for recognising, assessing and managing suspected sepsis in people aged 16 or over across community, custodial, ambulance, acute hospital and acute mental health settings. It introduces a risk-stratification framework based on the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) in acute settings, with four risk bands: very low (NEWS2=0), low (1–4), medium (5–6) and high (≥7), each linked to specific timeframes for clinical review and antibiotic administration.
Key interventions include: broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics within 1 hour for high-risk patients (NEWS2 ≥7), within 3 hours for medium-risk (NEWS2 5–6), and within 6 hours for low-risk (NEWS2 1–4); intravenous fluid resuscitation with isotonic crystalloids in 250 ml boluses (up to 1,000 ml total) for high-risk patients; and escalation pathways involving clinicians with core competencies in acute care (FY2 or above). The guideline emphasises clinical judgement when interpreting NEWS2 scores, particularly for patients with single parameters contributing 3 points, baseline physiological variations, or signs such as mottled/ashen appearance or non-blanching rash.
The 2026 update adds procalcitonin testing as a consideration for medium- and high-risk patients where results are available within an acceptable timeframe. The guideline also addresses antimicrobial stewardship by recommending deferral of broad-spectrum antibiotics in lower-risk groups to allow time for source identification, transfer arrangements for remote/rural settings where combined transfer and handover times exceed 1 hour, and specific management for neutropenic sepsis. Information and support recommendations emphasise shared decision-making, safety-netting advice at discharge, and awareness of groups most vulnerable to sepsis including people aged ≥75, those from ethnic minorities, people with frailty, immunosuppression, communication challenges, or social deprivation.
Key points
For clinicians — doses and thresholds as stated in the guideline
- Use NEWS2 score to stratify risk in acute hospital, mental health and ambulance settings: very low (0), low (1–4), medium (5–6), high (≥7); recalculate every 30 min (high risk), hourly (medium), 4–6 hourly (low), or per local protocol (very low).
- Give intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour (high risk), 3 hours (medium risk), or 6 hours (low risk) of first NEWS2 score on initial emergency department assessment or ward deterioration; do not delay once decision to give is made.
- In community/custodial settings, use table 1 criteria: high-risk includes objective altered mental state, respiratory rate ≥25/min, systolic BP ≤90 mmHg or >40 mmHg below normal, heart rate >130/min, no urine in 18 hours, mottled/ashen/cyanotic appearance, or non-blanching rash; medium-risk includes respiratory rate 21–24/min, systolic BP 91–100 mmHg, heart rate 91–130/min, no urine 12–18 hours, tympanic temperature <36°C, or signs of surgical site infection.
- Give intravenous fluid bolus of 250 ml isotonic crystalloid (Hartmann's or 0.9% saline) over 10–15 minutes to high-risk patients; reassess after each bolus; give further 250 ml boluses up to 1,000 ml total; seek senior advice if no improvement after 1,000 ml.
- For medium-risk patients with lactate >2 mmol/litre or acute kidney injury, manage as high risk; consider fluids after clinical assessment for medium-risk patients without hypoperfusion.
- Consider procalcitonin testing for medium- and high-risk patients where results are available within an acceptable timeframe to assist clinical decision-making.
- Transfer immediately to acute hospital if high-risk criteria met in community/custodial settings (999 ambulance); pre-alert secondary care; in remote/rural areas where combined transfer and handover >1 hour, GPs should have mechanisms to give antibiotics pre-hospital.
- Escalate to senior clinical decision maker if high-risk patient does not respond within 1 hour of any intervention; refer to or discuss with critical care; inform responsible consultant; for medium-risk patients arrange clinician with core competencies (FY2+) review within 1 hour; escalate if deterioration or no improvement.
Criteria for stratification of risk of severe illness or death from sepsis in people aged 16 or above in community or custodial settings (Table 1)
Table extracted from the guideline
| Category | High-risk criteria | Medium-risk criteria |
|---|---|---|
| History | Objective evidence of new altered mental state | History of acute deterioration of functional ability Impaired immune system (illness or drugs including oral steroids) Trauma, surgery or invasive procedures in last 6 weeks |
| Respiratory | Raised respiratory rate: 25 breaths per minute or more New need for oxygen (40% FiO₂ or more) to maintain saturation >92% (or >88% in chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure) |
Raised respiratory rate: 21 to 24 breaths per minute |
| Blood pressure | Systolic BP 90 mmHg or less or systolic BP >40 mmHg below normal | Systolic BP 91 to 100 mmHg |
| Circulation and hydration | Raised heart rate: >130 beats per minute Not passed urine in previous 18 hours For catheterised patients, <0.5 ml/kg of urine per hour |
Raised heart rate: 91 to 130 beats per minute (100 to 130 in pregnancy) or new-onset arrhythmia Not passed urine in past 12 to 18 hours For catheterised patients, 0.5 ml/kg to 1 ml/kg of urine per hour |
| Temperature | – | Tympanic temperature <36°C |
| Skin | Mottled or ashen appearance Cyanosis of skin, lips or tongue Non-blanching petechial or purpuric rash |
Signs of potential infection, including redness, swelling or discharge at surgical site or breakdown of wound |
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK), Suspected sepsis in people aged 16 or over: recognition, assessment and early management. Reproduced in summary form.
What changed in this edition
Versus the previous edition
- September 2026: added recommendations on considering procalcitonin testing for medium- and high-risk patients (1.8.2, 1.8.16); aligned risk-level labelling with NEWS2 terminology.
- January 2026: amended terminology from 'learning difficulties' to 'learning disabilities' throughout.
- November 2025: split the all-age sepsis guideline into three separate guidelines (under 16s, 16 and over, pregnant/recently pregnant); reviewed evidence on rapid antigen/PCR testing, indicators of organ hypoperfusion, intravenous fluid therapy, vasopressors, and sepsis risk factors; updated fluid bolus volume from 500 ml to 250 ml; removed human albumin solution from initial resuscitation; added recommendation on recent multiple presentations (1.3.6); clarified escalation criteria and timeframes; updated risk factor categorisation (1.2.1); amended mental health setting recommendations for clarity on facilities and expertise.
- 2024 update: introduced NEWS2-based risk stratification in acute settings (replacing previous lactate-based criteria); adopted AoMRC 2022 statement on antibiotic timing (1, 3, 6 hours by risk level); expanded surgical source control to include radiological interventions; amended neutropenic sepsis definition to include immunosuppressant therapy; clarified time zero as first NEWS2 on ED assessment or ward deterioration; added recommendations on peripheral vasopressor administration; updated escalation pathways to clinicians with core competencies (FY2+); removed discharge recommendations for medium/low-risk during initial management period.
From the guideline
Verbatim
“Give people aged 16 or over who are at high risk of severe illness or death from sepsis broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic treatment, within 1 hour of calculating the person's NEWS2 score on initial assessment in the emergency department or on ward deterioration.”
Editor’s perspective
Why this matters for Georgia and the region
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD
Editor-in-Chief, Georgian Medical Journal · Chair, Public Health Institute of Georgia · WHO consultant, health and migration
As Editor-in-Chief of the Georgian Medical Journal and Chair of the Public Health Institute of Georgia, I consider this NICE guideline particularly timely for our region. Georgia's UHC programme has expanded emergency department capacity since 2013, but standardised sepsis recognition and escalation protocols remain inconsistent across facilities. The NEWS2-based risk stratification offers a practical, reproducible tool that could be integrated into our national clinical protocols and the MyHealth electronic system to ensure timely escalation and antibiotic administration. I would particularly stress to Georgian clinicians the importance of the 250 ml fluid bolus approach with reassessment after each bolus—our clinical culture has historically favoured larger initial volumes, but the evidence supports this more cautious strategy to avoid fluid overload, especially in older patients and those with cardiac or renal comorbidity. One realistic implementation caveat: the guideline's emphasis on FY2-level or senior clinical decision makers for medium- and high-risk cases assumes availability that may not match our staffing realities in regional hospitals, especially overnight; we will need to develop context-appropriate escalation pathways, perhaps leveraging telemedicine consultations with tertiary centres, and ensure that all emergency physicians receive focused training in sepsis management rather than relying solely on seniority for decision-making authority.
ORCID 0000-0001-7609-4515 · Perspective written for the GMJ Guidelines Library, 23 Oct 2026
Applicability
Georgia and the South Caucasus
This guideline is directly applicable to Georgia and the South Caucasus, where sepsis remains a leading cause of preventable in-hospital mortality. Implementation would require: (1) adoption of NEWS2 across emergency departments and inpatient wards (Georgia’s UHC programme hospitals and regional referral centres could pilot this using existing vital-signs monitoring); (2) development of local antimicrobial formularies aligned with national resistance patterns (the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health antimicrobial resistance surveillance data should inform choices); (3) training clinicians in risk-stratification and escalation pathways, particularly in resource-limited settings where senior decision-makers may not be immediately available; (4) establishing mechanisms for pre-hospital antibiotic administration in rural areas of Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan where transport times routinely exceed 1 hour; and (5) ensuring procalcitonin testing availability in tertiary centres (currently limited in the region). The guideline’s emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship (deferring broad-spectrum antibiotics in lower-risk groups) aligns with regional priorities to combat antimicrobial resistance, which is rising across the Caucasus. Adaptation for local contexts should consider baseline physiological variations (e.g., higher prevalence of chronic respiratory disease in some populations), availability of intensive care beds, and cultural factors affecting communication with patients and families. Georgia’s electronic health record infrastructure (MyHealth portal) could support standardised NEWS2 documentation and audit.
Questions this guideline answers
Quick answers
What NEWS2 score indicates high risk of severe illness or death from sepsis?
A NEWS2 score of 7 or above indicates high risk. Also treat as high risk if NEWS2 is below 7 but: a single parameter contributes 3 points and medical review confirms high risk, or there are clinical concerns such as mottled/ashen appearance, non-blanching rash, cyanosis, deterioration since previous score, or lack of improvement despite interventions.
How quickly should antibiotics be given in suspected sepsis?
Within 1 hour of the first NEWS2 score for high-risk patients (NEWS2 ≥7), within 3 hours for medium-risk patients (NEWS2 5–6), and within 6 hours for low-risk patients (NEWS2 1–4). These are maximum timeframes; once a decision to give antibiotics is made, do not delay administration further. Always use clinical judgement to determine if earlier administration is needed.
What type and volume of intravenous fluid should be given initially?
Use isotonic electrolyte crystalloid solution (balanced solution such as Hartmann's, or 0.9% saline if balanced solution not available). Give an initial bolus of 250 ml over 10–15 minutes. Reassess after each bolus. Give further 250 ml boluses if needed, up to 1,000 ml total (including any fluids previously given). If no improvement after 1,000 ml, get advice from a senior clinical decision maker.
When should peripheral vasopressors be considered and how should they be given?
Discuss with the critical care team (or senior clinical decision maker if not available) whether vasopressors should be given and whether they should be started peripherally if central access is not available. Before starting, make a shared decision with the person and family about appropriateness of escalation, considering overall condition, advance care plans, and urgency. If starting peripherally: follow local policies on choice, dose, concentration and monitoring; ensure the peripheral line and cannula are visible; monitor for adverse events, particularly extravasation.
Related on GMJ
Interconnected resources
Dictionary of Public Health
Drugs A–Z
GMJ News coverage
- Sepsis AI Algorithms Fail When Trained on Future Data, Study Reveals Critical FlawsJul 2026
- Five-year survival gap persists after septic shock discharge, study findsAug 2026
- Early Vasopressors Versus Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock: Major Trial Challenges Standard PracticeJul 2026
- Orthostatic Hypotension in Parkinson's Disease: New Clinical Practice GuidelinesJul 2026
ASF accreditation standards
Other guidelines on this topic
- Instrumental delivery — MSF Essential obstetric and newborn care
- Prolapsed cord — MSF Essential obstetric and newborn care
- Artificial rupture of the membranes — MSF Essential obstetric and newborn care
- Monitoring labour and delivery — MSF Essential obstetric and newborn care
- Normal delivery — Essential obstetric and newborn care — MSF Essential obstetric and newborn care
- Issuer
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK)
- Type
- Guideline
- Edition
- Updated September 2026 (originally published November 2025, replacing NG51 from 2016)
- Replaces
- Sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management (NG51, 2016) – now split into three age-specific guidelines
- Status
- Current
- Published
- 2026-03-01
- Languages
- English
- Scope
- Recognition, assessment and early management of suspected sepsis in people aged 16 years or over in all healthcare settings (community, custodial, ambulance, acute hospital, acute mental health)
- Audience
- All healthcare professionals involved in assessing and managing people with suspected sepsis: GPs, emergency department staff, hospital doctors and nurses, ambulance crews, community and custodial healthcare staff, acute mental health setting staff
- Licence
- © NICE 2026. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights.
- Evidence
- Systematic reviews of diagnostic and prognostic studies, RCTs and observational studies; GRADE assessment; formal consensus for areas without direct evidence; updated 2024–2026 with new evidence reviews on NEWS2 stratification, antibiotics, fluids, vasopressors, hypoperfusion indicators, rapid tests, risk factors and procalcitonin
- Record history
- Created 23 Oct 2026 · updated 23 Oct 2026 · next check Apr 2027
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected sepsis in people aged 16 or over: recognition, assessment and early management. NICE guideline [NG253]. London: NICE; 2025 Nov 19 (updated 2026 Sep 23). Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng253GMJ Guidelines Library records are original summaries written by the GMJ editorial team from the issuer’s published document and reviewed by a physician. They do not replace the full guideline. The document is the copyright of its issuer and is linked, not hosted. Spotted an error or a newer edition? Tell the Guidelines Desk.
Was this article helpful?

