From Tuberculosis › Chapter 10: Treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis · Médecins Sans Frontières, Current online edition, 2026
Guidance on managing treatment interruptions in multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis patients.
- Issuer
- Médecins Sans Frontières
- Edition
- Current online edition, 2026
- Audience
- Clinicians treating MDR/RR-TB
- Evidence
- Expert consensus
- Reviewed
- 23 Oct 2026 · GMJ
What this guideline says
GMJ summary
This section of the MSF tuberculosis guideline addresses the management of treatment interruptions in patients with multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). Treatment interruptions pose significant risks: they may lead to the emergence of new drug resistances, and drugs with long half-lives such as bedaquiline or clofazimine remain in the blood for several months after interruption, effectively creating functional monotherapy that increases resistance risk.
The guidance stratifies management by duration of interruption. Patients who interrupt treatment for 2 months or more are classified as “lost to follow-up” and require repeat bacteriological testing (rapid molecular test, culture and full phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and/or genome sequencing) upon return, with initiation of a new regimen based on rapid molecular test results whilst awaiting full results. For interruptions of 4 weeks or more but less than 2 months, the same testing is required, but clinicians may either start a new regimen or resume the interrupted treatment based on clinical status and rapid molecular test results, with missed doses made up if treatment is resumed.
The guideline emphasises the importance of detecting and addressing the underlying causes of treatment interruption, including management of adverse effects and reinforcement of patient support measures.
Key points
For clinicians — doses and thresholds as stated in the guideline
- Treatment interruptions may lead to emergence of new drug resistances, particularly to bedaquiline and clofazimine which remain in blood for several months after interruption.
- Patients interrupting treatment for 2 months or more meet the definition of "lost to follow-up" and require repeat bacteriological tests (rapid molecular test, culture, full phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and/or genome sequencing) upon return.
- For interruptions of 2 months or more: start a new regimen based on rapid molecular test results whilst waiting for full drug susceptibility test results, then adjust treatment accordingly.
- For interruptions of 4 weeks or more but less than 2 months: perform new bacteriological tests and either start a new regimen or resume interrupted treatment based on clinical status and rapid molecular test results.
- If interrupted treatment is resumed after 4 weeks to 2 months, all doses missed during the interruption must be made up to complete the full treatment course.
- Actively detect and address problems causing treatment interruptions, including management of adverse effects and reinforcement of patient support measures.
- Long half-life drugs (bedaquiline, clofazimine) create a functional monotherapy situation after treatment interruption, substantially increasing resistance development risk.
From the guideline
Verbatim
“In practice, it is as if the patient is receiving bedaquiline and/or clofazimine alone, which increases the risk of developing resistance to these drugs.”
Editor’s perspective
Why this matters for Georgia and the region
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD
Editor-in-Chief, Georgian Medical Journal · Chair, Public Health Institute of Georgia · WHO consultant, health and migration
As Chair of the Public Health Institute of Georgia, I recognise that treatment interruptions remain a critical challenge in our national MDR-TB programme, where adherence support and patient retention are ongoing priorities. The guideline's stratified approach—distinguishing between interruptions of 4 weeks versus 2 months—provides a pragmatic framework that balances the risk of emerging resistance against the practical realities of patient behaviour. I would stress to Georgian clinicians the particular danger posed by long half-life drugs like bedaquiline: when patients interrupt treatment, these medicines linger for months, creating functional monotherapy that rapidly breeds resistance to our most valuable second-line agents. The main implementation challenge will be ensuring that our laboratory network can deliver timely phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and genome sequencing for all returning patients, as capacity for comprehensive DST remains limited outside the National TB Reference Laboratory in Tbilisi.
ORCID 0000-0001-7609-4515 · Perspective written for the GMJ Guidelines Library, 23 Oct 2026
Applicability
Georgia and the South Caucasus
For Georgia and the South Caucasus region, where multidrug-resistant tuberculosis remains a significant public health challenge, this guidance is directly applicable to national TB programmes. The emphasis on rapid molecular testing and genome sequencing aligns with modern diagnostic capacity, though national programmes must ensure laboratory infrastructure can support timely phenotypic drug susceptibility testing for returning patients. The stratified approach to treatment interruptions (distinguishing 4-week and 2-month thresholds) requires robust patient tracking systems and should be integrated into national TB treatment protocols. Given migration patterns in the region, coordination between countries on management of patients who interrupt treatment across borders is essential for effective implementation.
Questions this guideline answers
Quick answers
What defines a patient as "lost to follow-up" in MDR/RR-TB treatment?
A patient who has interrupted the entire treatment for 2 months or more meets the definition of "lost to follow-up" according to this guideline.
Why is treatment interruption particularly risky with bedaquiline and clofazimine?
These drugs have long half-lives and remain in the blood for several months after interruption. This means the patient is effectively receiving bedaquiline and/or clofazimine alone (functional monotherapy), which substantially increases the risk of developing resistance to these critical drugs.
What testing is required when a patient returns after interrupting MDR/RR-TB treatment for 6 weeks?
For interruptions of 4 weeks or more but less than 2 months, perform new bacteriological tests including rapid molecular test, culture, and full phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and/or genome sequencing. Based on clinical status and rapid molecular test results, either start a new regimen or resume the interrupted treatment whilst awaiting full results.
If treatment is resumed after a 6-week interruption, how should the missed doses be handled?
If the interrupted treatment is resumed, all doses missed during the interruption period must be made up to complete the full treatment course.
Related on GMJ
Interconnected resources
GMJ News coverage
Quality & accreditation
- ASF Laboratory — Standard 1 — Governance & Document Control
- ASF Laboratory — Standard 6 — Pre-Examination: Specimen Pathway
- ASF Laboratory — Standard 7 — Examination: Process & Safety
- ASF Laboratory — Standard 8 — Post-Examination: Reporting & Critical Values
- ASF Hospital — Standard 13 — Radiology
- ASF Laboratory — Standard 4 — Equipment, Reagents & Traceability
Same guideline
- Treatment adaptation and change of treatment — MSF TuberculosisChapter 10: Treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis
- Adverse effects — MSF TuberculosisChapter 10: Treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis
- Patient Monitoring — Multidrug-Resistant and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis — MSF TuberculosisChapter 10: Treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis
- Special situations in multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment — MSF TuberculosisChapter 10: Treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis
- Treatment regimens in operational research conditions — MSF TuberculosisChapter 10: Treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis
- Treatment Regimens in Programmatic Conditions for Multidrug-Resistant and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis — MSF TuberculosisChapter 10: Treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis
Other guidelines on this topic
- Treatment adaptation and change of treatment — MSF Tuberculosis
- Adverse effects — MSF Tuberculosis
- Patient Monitoring — Multidrug-Resistant and Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis — MSF Tuberculosis
- Guidance on evidence generation on new tuberculosis diagnostics
- Special situations in multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment — MSF Tuberculosis
- Issuer
- Médecins Sans Frontières
- Guideline
- Tuberculosis
- Chapter
- Chapter 10: Treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis
- Type
- Clinical guideline (chapter)
- Edition
- Current online edition, 2026
- Status
- Current
- Published
- 2026-10-14
- Scope
- Multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis
- Audience
- Clinicians treating MDR/RR-TB
- Evidence
- Expert consensus
- Record history
- Created 23 Oct 2026 · updated 23 Oct 2026 · next check Apr 2027
Médecins Sans Frontières. Treatment interruptions. In: Tuberculosis. Chapter 10: Treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, section 10.9. Paris: MSF; 2026 Oct 14.GMJ Guidelines Library records are original summaries written by the GMJ editorial team from the issuer’s published document and reviewed by a physician. They do not replace the full guideline. The document is the copyright of its issuer and is linked, not hosted. Spotted an error or a newer edition? Tell the Guidelines Desk.
Was this article helpful?

