By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
GMJ NewsGMJ NewsGMJ News
  • Latest News
    • GMJ Briefs
  • Podcast & Media
    • Podcast Episodes
    • GMJ Audio
    • GMJ Videos
  • Research Digest
    • New Studies
    • Georgian Research
    • Data & Numbers
  • Policy & Systems
    • Health Policy
    • Quality & Safety
    • Migration & Health
    • Global Health
  • Practice
    • Clinical Updates
    • Case Discussions
    • Pharmacy & Prescribing
    • Ingredients A-Z
  • Dictionary
    • Browse A–Z
    • About the Project
    • Contribute a Term
  • Perspectives
    • Editorial
    • Explainers
    • Voices
    • Letters
  • Health Topics
  • GMJ Articles
    • Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2026)
    • Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2026)
    • Pre-Launch Articles (2025)
  • Read the Journal →
  • About GMJ News
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
GMJ NewsGMJ News
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest News
    • GMJ Briefs
  • Podcast & Media
    • Podcast Episodes
    • GMJ Audio
    • GMJ Videos
  • Research Digest
    • New Studies
    • Georgian Research
    • Data & Numbers
  • Policy & Systems
    • Health Policy
    • Quality & Safety
    • Migration & Health
    • Global Health
  • Practice
    • Clinical Updates
    • Case Discussions
    • Pharmacy & Prescribing
    • Ingredients A-Z
  • Dictionary
    • Browse A–Z
    • About the Project
    • Contribute a Term
  • Perspectives
    • Editorial
    • Explainers
    • Voices
    • Letters
  • Health Topics
  • GMJ Articles
    • Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2026)
    • Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2026)
    • Pre-Launch Articles (2025)
  • Read the Journal →
  • About GMJ News
Follow US
GMJ News > GMJ Briefs > Policy Changes Alone Don’t Drive Clinical Adoption: The Gene Expression Testing Gap in Breast Cancer Care

Policy Changes Alone Don’t Drive Clinical Adoption: The Gene Expression Testing Gap in Breast Cancer Care

GMJ
Last updated: 06/08/2026 07:29
By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
Share
1 Min Read
Infographic showing 33% uptake of gene expression testing in breast cancer patients
Research from the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Centre finds that only one-third of breast cancer patients eligible for gene expression testing receive the test, despite recent reimbursement policy changes. The findings suggest that systemic barriers—not cost—limit adoption of this valuable diagnostic tool. — Photo by MJH SHIKDER on Unsplash (Unsplash License)
SHARE
1 min read|127 words

New research from the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Centre reveals a critical implementation gap in personalised cancer medicine. Despite policy reforms that removed financial barriers to gene expression testing, only one-third of eligible breast cancer patients receive the diagnostic tool that could spare them from unnecessary chemotherapy.

The study, published in the International Journal of Cancer and led by Prof. Sabine Siesling, demonstrates that reimbursement policy changes alone are insufficient to drive clinical practice change. Researchers identified three systemic barriers limiting adoption: inadequate clinician awareness of testing benefits, insufficient laboratory capacity, and gaps in clinical workflow integration.

These findings highlight a crucial lesson for healthcare systems: bridging the gap between policy enablement and clinical implementation requires coordinated efforts addressing education, infrastructure, and workflow redesign—not financial incentives alone.

Was this article helpful?

GMJ Brief · Announcement

📰 Read the full article: Only one-third of eligible breast cancer patients receive gene expression testing in the Netherlands →

Related reference
  • Breast Cancer · Condition
Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Copy Link Print
GMJ
ByProf. Giorgi Pkhakadze
Follow:
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD, is Editor-in-Chief of the Georgian Medical Journal and Chair of the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG). He is Professor and Head of the Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences at David Tvildiani Medical University, and Secretary/Treasurer of the UEMS Section of Public Health. ORCID: 0000-0001-7609-4515.

Submit Your Paper →

Georgia's peer-reviewed open-access medical journal. No APC until January 2027.
Submit Manuscript →
Ethiopia Study Reveals Stakeholder Concerns Over Novel Malaria Treatments

A qualitative study in Ethiopia reveals that health workers and patients view…

Sitafloxacin monotherapy matches doxycycline-rifampicin for brucellosis treatment in landmark trial

A multicenter randomized trial in The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific…

Ultra-processed foods linked to higher kidney cancer risk in large US study

A prospective analysis of over 300,000 US adults found that higher consumption…

Submit Your Paper to GMJ

No APC until January 2027.
Submit Manuscript →

You Might Also Like

Young person with keys to new apartment representing successful transition from care

Structured Support Models Transform Housing Outcomes for Care Leavers

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
22/06/2026
Medical illustration showing cardiac patch therapy on damaged heart tissue

What You Need to Know About Cardiac Patch Therapy: Three Key Advances Reshaping Heart Repair

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
28/06/2026
Emergency department physician consulting with patient about mental health crisis intervention

NEJM Perspective: Personalized Care Over Protocol in Suicide Prevention

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
09/07/2026
Global HealthPolicy & Systems

Ebola outbreak in DR Congo raises concerns over international response capacity

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
26/05/2026
Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact US
  • GMJ Journal
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Editorial Team
  • Register at GMJ
  • Terms of Use

Subscribe to GMJ News — Click here

Join Community
© 2026 Georgian Medical Journal (GMJ). Published by the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG). All rights reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?