Announcement: Magnesium Supplement Claims vs. Evidence: What the Science Actually Shows

ბოლო განახლება: 14/08/2026 13:29

ავტორი:

0 Min Read

Animal studies show tissue-specific magnesium uptake, but human trials have not replicated these findings. Multiple magnesium forms demonstrate similar cognitive and sleep benefits, suggesting total dose matters more than formulation type. — Photo by Supliful - Supplements On Demand on Unsplash (Unsplash License)

1 min read|49 words

Magnesium threonate for brain health, glycinate for calm—but where's the human evidence? New review finds animal studies show tissue-selective uptake, yet human trials comparing formulations barely exist. Total dose & adherence matter more than marketing claims. Read our evidence breakdown.

Read the full article on GMJ Newsroom →

Was this article helpful?

GMJ Brief · Announcement

📰 Read the full article: Magnesium Supplement Claims vs. Evidence: What the Science Actually Shows →

Share This Article

ავტორი:Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze

Follow:

Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD, is Editor-in-Chief of the Georgian Medical Journal and Chair of the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG). He is Professor and Head of the Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences at David Tvildiani Medical University, and Secretary/Treasurer of the UEMS Section of Public Health. ORCID: 0000-0001-7609-4515.

Announcement: Magnesium Supplement Claims vs. Evidence: What the Science Actually Shows

Submit Your Paper →

Primary aldosteronism: why screening for this overlooked cause of hypertension matters

Georgian Dictionary of Public Health

Balance Problems and the Vulnerable Mind: A Gene Study Links the Inner Ear to Cognition

Submit Your Paper to GMJ

Company

You Might Also Like