From Tuberculosis › Chapter 3: Diagnosis and follow-up investigations · Médecins Sans Frontières, Current online edition, 2026
Comprehensive guidance on diagnosis and follow-up investigations for active TB using bacteriological, molecular and imaging techniques.
- Issuer
- Médecins Sans Frontières
- Edition
- Current online edition, 2026
- Audience
- Clinicians, laboratory staff, and TB programme managers
- Evidence
- Evidence-based recommendations with WHO-validated diagnostic tools and cited performance studies
- Reviewed
- 21 Oct 2026 · GMJ
What this guideline says
GMJ summary
This MSF guideline section provides detailed recommendations for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis through bacteriological confirmation, drug susceptibility testing and supportive investigations. The guideline prioritizes rapid molecular tests (RMTs) as the initial diagnostic approach for all patients with presumed TB, replacing microscopy as the first-line test. All patients with confirmed TB should undergo drug susceptibility testing, with priority given to patients at high risk of mortality (HIV infection, extensive disease) or high risk of resistance (previous TB treatment, contact with drug-resistant cases, or from high-prevalence areas).
The guideline comprehensively describes the performance characteristics and appropriate use of multiple diagnostic platforms, including Xpert MTB/RIF and Ultra, Xpert MTB/XDR, Truenat assays, line probe assays, genome sequencing, culture and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra is preferred for patients with HIV infection, children, extrapulmonary specimens and smear-negative specimens due to higher sensitivity, though specificity is lower in patients with previous TB history. The lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay (LF-LAM) is recommended for specific HIV-positive patient groups as a rapid point-of-care test.
The guideline emphasizes that negative bacteriological tests do not rule out TB, and that drug susceptibility testing may require multiple modalities (genotypic and phenotypic) depending on the drug and local resistance patterns. Chest X-ray remains important for detecting abnormalities suggestive of pulmonary TB, evaluating severity and monitoring treatment response, with digital radiography and computer-aided detection increasingly useful in programmatic settings.
Key points
For clinicians — doses and thresholds as stated in the guideline
- All patients with presumed TB should be tested with a rapid molecular test (RMT) to detect M. tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance; when microscopy is the only diagnostic test available, specimens should be sent to a facility with capacity to perform RMTs
- Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra has higher sensitivity than Xpert MTB/RIF (+ 5%) but lower specificity (- 3.2% overall, – 5.4% in patients with TB history); it provides a 'trace' result for lowest bacillary load but may indicate dead bacilli in those with previous TB
- Drug susceptibility testing is indicated for all patients with confirmed TB; priority should be given to patients with high risk of mortality (HIV infection, extensive disease) or high risk of resistance (previous TB treatment, contact with resistant case, or from high-prevalence area)
- LF-LAM testing is recommended for: HIV-infected patients with signs/symptoms of TB or seriously ill (respiratory rate > 30/min, temperature > 39 °C, heart rate > 120/min, unable to walk unaided); inpatients with advanced HIV disease (CD4 < 200 cells/mm³ or WHO stage 3/4); and outpatients with HIV and CD4 < 100 cells/mm³
- Xpert MTB/XDR should be used to detect isoniazid resistance in all patients if possible, and at least those with high risk; to detect fluoroquinolone resistance before using fluoroquinolone-containing regimens; and to detect resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and thionamides when rifampicin resistance is detected
- Smear microscopy has 65% sensitivity compared to culture and approximately 86% of smear-positive patients are identified during the first examination, with an additional 12% during the second; more than two examinations are not necessary
- Phenotypic DST is highly reliable for isoniazid, rifampicin, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides; unreliable for ethambutol, ethionamide, cycloserine/terizidone and para-aminosalicylic acid; reliable but with limited access for bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine and delamanid
- For pleural effusion, adenosine deaminase (ADA) > 50 U/litre with lymphocyte-neutrophil ratio > 0.75 increases specificity for TB; for peritoneal fluid, ADA > 39 U/litre is likely due to TB; pleural effusion with ADA < 40 U/litre is much less likely TB
Table 3.2 – Main performances of Xpert assays
Table extracted from the guideline
| Xpert assays | Performances |
|---|---|
| MTB/RIF | Detection of M. tuberculosis compared to culture: sputum smear-positive 99%, smear-negative 68%, patients with HIV infection 79%. Specificity 99% in all specimens. Detection of rifampicin resistance: sensitivity 95%, specificity 98% |
| MTB/RIF Ultra | Detection of MTB: sensitivity +5% compared to Xpert MTB/RIF. Specificity -3.2% compared to Xpert MTB/RIF; -5.4% in patients with history of TB. No result for rifampicin resistance if 'trace' result |
| MTB/XDR | Detection of MTB: as Xpert MTB/RIF. To isoniazid (low- and high-level): sensitivity 94.2%, specificity 98%. To fluoroquinolones: sensitivity 93.1%, specificity 98.3%. To aminoglycosides: sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 98.9%. To thionamides: sensitivity 51.7%, specificity 98.3% |
Source: Médecins Sans Frontières, Active tuberculosis — MSF Tuberculosis. Reproduced in summary form.
From the guideline
Verbatim
“Drug susceptibility testing (DST) is indicated for all patients with confirmed TB.”
Editor’s perspective
Why this matters for Georgia and the region
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD
Editor-in-Chief, Georgian Medical Journal · Chair, Public Health Institute of Georgia · WHO consultant, health and migration
As someone who has advised on TB control strategies across the WHO European Region, I consider this MSF diagnostic framework essential reading for Georgian clinicians managing tuberculosis. The emphasis on rapid molecular testing as the initial diagnostic approach represents a paradigm shift that Georgia's National TB Programme has been implementing progressively, though gaps remain in peripheral facilities. I would stress to colleagues the critical recommendation to perform drug susceptibility testing on all confirmed TB cases, not only those with obvious risk factors, because our regional data consistently show unexpected resistance patterns that would be missed by risk-based testing alone. The practical challenge for Georgia will be ensuring that the recommended cascade from Xpert MTB/RIF or Ultra to Xpert MTB/XDR to culture and phenotypic or genotypic DST functions smoothly, which requires not only equipment and reagents but also robust specimen transport networks, reliable electricity in rural areas, and sustained training of laboratory personnel—infrastructure investments that must accompany adoption of these evidence-based diagnostic algorithms.
ORCID 0000-0001-7609-4515 · Perspective written for the GMJ Guidelines Library, 21 Oct 2026
Applicability
Georgia and the South Caucasus
This comprehensive diagnostic guidance is directly applicable to Georgia and the South Caucasus region, where tuberculosis remains a significant public health challenge with documented multidrug-resistant TB prevalence. Georgia’s National TB Programme would benefit particularly from the prioritization of Xpert technologies over traditional microscopy, as the country has been scaling up GeneXpert capacity through international support. The recommendations for targeted drug susceptibility testing in high-risk patients align with regional epidemiology, given the relatively high rates of drug-resistant TB in Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. Implementation considerations include ensuring uninterrupted power supply for Xpert platforms in rural areas, establishing efficient specimen transport systems to reference laboratories for culture and sequencing, and training radiologists or implementing computer-aided detection software for chest X-ray interpretation. The LF-LAM recommendations for HIV-positive patients are particularly relevant given the TB/HIV co-infection burden, though integration with existing HIV care programmes will require coordination between vertical disease control structures.
Questions this guideline answers
Quick answers
When should Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra be preferred over Xpert MTB/RIF?
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra should be preferred for patients with HIV infection, children, extrapulmonary specimens, and sputum smear-negative specimens because it has 5% higher sensitivity. However, its specificity is 3.2% lower overall and 5.4% lower in patients with a history of TB, where a 'trace' result may indicate fragments of dead bacilli rather than active disease.
What does an 'indeterminate' rifampicin resistance result mean and what should I do?
An indeterminate result means the test detected M. tuberculosis but could not determine rifampicin susceptibility. In this situation, phenotypic drug susceptibility testing should be performed on a culture isolate, and if the patient is at high risk of resistance, empirical treatment considerations may be needed while awaiting results. Xpert MTB/XDR can be used to test for isoniazid and other drug resistance on the same specimen.
Can I rule out TB with a negative Xpert test?
No. Negative bacteriological tests for M. tuberculosis do not rule out TB. Xpert assays have high specificity (99%) but lower sensitivity than culture, particularly in smear-negative patients (68% sensitivity), children, and patients with HIV infection (79% sensitivity). Clinical diagnosis supported by chest X-ray, symptomatology and response to treatment may still be warranted, and culture should be considered in patients with high clinical suspicion despite negative RMT.
Which drugs can be reliably tested by phenotypic drug susceptibility testing?
Phenotypic DST is highly reliable for isoniazid, rifampicin, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides. It is unreliable and should not be performed for ethambutol, ethionamide, cycloserine/terizidone, and para-aminosalicylic acid. For bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine and delamanid, pDST is reliable but rarely available outside supranational reference laboratories. Pyrazinamide pDST is reliable but difficult to perform and requires a high-quality laboratory.
Related on GMJ
Interconnected resources
Dictionary of Public Health
Conditions A–Z
GMJ News coverage
Quality & accreditation
- ASF Hospital — Standard 13 — Radiology
- ASF Laboratory — Standard 4 — Equipment, Reagents & Traceability
- ASF Laboratory — Standard 1 — Governance & Document Control
- ASF Laboratory — Standard 6 — Pre-Examination: Specimen Pathway
- ASF Laboratory — Standard 7 — Examination: Process & Safety
- ASF Laboratory — Standard 8 — Post-Examination: Reporting & Critical Values
Same guideline
- Summary of clinical presentations of tuberculosis — MSF TuberculosisChapter 2: Clinical presentation
- Clinical presentation of tuberculosis in HIV-infected persons — MSF TuberculosisChapter 2: Clinical presentation
- Disseminated or miliary tuberculosis — MSF TuberculosisChapter 2: Clinical presentation
- Extrapulmonary tuberculosis — MSF TuberculosisChapter 2: Clinical presentation
- Pulmonary tuberculosis — MSF TuberculosisChapter 2: Clinical presentation
Other guidelines on this topic
- Issuer
- Médecins Sans Frontières
- Guideline
- Tuberculosis
- Chapter
- Chapter 3: Diagnosis and follow-up investigations
- Type
- Clinical guideline (chapter)
- Edition
- Current online edition, 2026
- Status
- Current
- Published
- 2026-10-14
- Scope
- Diagnosis and follow-up investigations for active tuberculosis (Section 3.1 of MSF TB guideline)
- Audience
- Clinicians, laboratory staff, and TB programme managers
- Evidence
- Evidence-based recommendations with WHO-validated diagnostic tools and cited performance studies
- Record history
- Created 21 Oct 2026 · updated 21 Oct 2026 · next check Apr 2027
Médecins Sans Frontières. Active tuberculosis. In: Tuberculosis [guideline]. Section 3.1 of Chapter 3: Diagnosis and follow-up investigations. Paris: MSF; 2026 Oct 14.GMJ Guidelines Library records are original summaries written by the GMJ editorial team from the issuer’s published document and reviewed by a physician. They do not replace the full guideline. The document is the copyright of its issuer and is linked, not hosted. Spotted an error or a newer edition? Tell the Guidelines Desk.
Was this article helpful?

