By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
GMJ NewsGMJ NewsGMJ News
  • Latest News
    • GMJ Briefs
  • Podcast & Media
    • Podcast Episodes
    • GMJ Audio
    • GMJ Videos
  • Research Digest
    • New Studies
    • Georgian Research
    • Data & Numbers
  • Policy & Systems
    • Health Policy
    • Quality & Safety
    • Migration & Health
    • Global Health
  • Practice
    • Clinical Updates
    • Case Discussions
    • Pharmacy & Prescribing
    • Ingredients A-Z
  • Perspectives
    • Editorial
    • Explainers
    • Voices
    • Letters
  • GMJ Articles
    • Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2026)
    • Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2026)
    • Pre-Launch Articles (2025)
  • Read the Journal →
  • About GMJ News
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
GMJ NewsGMJ News
Font ResizerAa
  • Latest News
    • GMJ Briefs
  • Podcast & Media
    • Podcast Episodes
    • GMJ Audio
    • GMJ Videos
  • Research Digest
    • New Studies
    • Georgian Research
    • Data & Numbers
  • Policy & Systems
    • Health Policy
    • Quality & Safety
    • Migration & Health
    • Global Health
  • Practice
    • Clinical Updates
    • Case Discussions
    • Pharmacy & Prescribing
    • Ingredients A-Z
  • Perspectives
    • Editorial
    • Explainers
    • Voices
    • Letters
  • GMJ Articles
    • Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2026)
    • Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2026)
    • Pre-Launch Articles (2025)
  • Read the Journal →
  • About GMJ News
Follow US
GMJ News > GMJ Briefs > Clinical Guidelines Still Rely on Race-Based Dosing Despite Scientific Concerns

Clinical Guidelines Still Rely on Race-Based Dosing Despite Scientific Concerns

GMJ
Last updated: 27/06/2026 21:17
By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
Share
1 Min Read
Medical professional reviewing medication dosing guidelines and genetic testing results
New NEJM analysis challenges race-based medication dosing, arguing it lacks scientific foundation and may harm patients. Authors advocate for precision medicine approaches using genetic testing and biomarkers instead of racial categories. — Bi-lingual Clinical Trial Consultation (45067326622).jpg by NIAID / CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)
SHARE
1 min read|150 words

Current clinical guidelines recommend race-based dosing adjustments for multiple medications, yet emerging research suggests this widespread practice may be scientifically flawed and potentially harmful to patients. A new NEJM analysis highlights the disconnect between entrenched clinical practice and evolving scientific understanding.

The fundamental problem lies in treating race as a biological variable when it actually serves as a poor predictor of drug metabolism. Genetic variations affecting pharmacokinetic response exist along a continuum across human populations rather than clustering neatly within racial categories. Consequently, individuals within the same racial group demonstrate enormous variation in drug response, while some individuals from different racial backgrounds may show similar metabolic patterns.

This evidence gap underscores the urgent need for clinical guideline updates that prioritize pharmacogenetic testing and biomarker-driven approaches over demographic categories. Such modernization could enhance treatment precision while reducing potential harms associated with misguided racial assumptions.

Read the full article on GMJ Newsroom.

Submit Your Paper
GMJ_Submit_Banner

Was this article helpful?

GMJ Brief · Key Finding

📰 Read the full article: Medical Dosing Based on Race Lacks Scientific Evidence and May Harm Patients, NEJM Analysis Warns →

Related reference
  • SAMe · Ingredient
Share This Article
Facebook LinkedIn Bluesky Copy Link Print
GMJ
ByProf. Giorgi Pkhakadze
Follow:
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD, is Editor-in-Chief of the Georgian Medical Journal and Chair of the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG). He is Professor and Head of the Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences at David Tvildiani Medical University, and Secretary/Treasurer of the UEMS Section of Public Health. ORCID: 0000-0001-7609-4515.

Submit Your Paper →

Georgia's peer-reviewed open-access medical journal. No APC until January 2027.
Submit Manuscript →
WHO Strengthens Health Systems in Cabo Verde Through 2024–2025 Technical Cooperation

The WHO Regional Office for Africa has published results of its technical…

Ebola Bundibugyo outbreak in DRC triggers infodemic surge, with misinformation undermining public health response

Official confirmation of Ebola Bundibugyo in the DRC on 15 May 2026…

UK and US Regulators Launch Joint Liaison Programme to Strengthen Drug Approval Coordination

The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and US Food…

Submit Your Paper to GMJ

No APC until January 2027.
Submit Manuscript →

You Might Also Like

FDA Class I recall notice for VOCSN V+Pro ventilators showing medical device safety alert

React Health Initiates Voluntary Removal of VOCSN V+Pro Ventilators Following FDA Safety Alert

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
31/05/2026

EBOLA CROSS-BORDER TRANSMISSION: DRC-UGANDA PHEIC DECLARED

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
31/05/2026
Global HealthPolicy & Systems

WHO Declares Public Health Emergency as Ebola Crosses DRC-Uganda Border

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
31/05/2026
Scientific illustration of cell division failure showing tetraploid cells with doubled DNA content

What Clinicians Need to Know About Surviving Tetraploid Cells

By
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze
27/06/2026
Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram
Company
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact US
  • GMJ Journal
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Editorial Team
  • Register at GMJ
  • Terms of Use

Subscribe to GMJ News — Click here

Join Community
© 2026 Georgian Medical Journal (GMJ). Published by the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG). All rights reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?

Not a member? Sign Up