Pan American Health Organization · 2022
A toolkit of proven community-based programmes to support self-management, locomotor capacity, psychological well-being, cognition and caregivers in older adults.
- Issuer
- Pan American Health Organization
- Edition
- 2022
- Audience
- Primary care providers, community health workers, public health professionals, programme managers, caregivers
- Evidence
- Evidence-based programmes with published randomised controlled trials and effectiveness studies in peer-reviewed journals
- Reviewed
- 18 Oct 2026 · GMJ
What this guideline says
GMJ summary
This PAHO portfolio presents evidence-based programmes designed to improve or maintain intrinsic capacity in older adults at the primary health-care level. It aligns with WHO’s Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework and the Decade of Healthy Aging (2021–2030), supporting the shift from disease-focused to capacity-focused care. The document offers implementation guidance for programmes across five domains: self-management for chronic conditions, locomotor capacity and falls prevention, psychological capacity (depression management), cognitive capacity, and caregiver support.
The portfolio emphasises that self-management support—providing older people with information, skills, and tools—is essential for person-centred care. Each programme has been tested in community settings, published in peer-reviewed journals, and shown to deliver positive outcomes when implemented with fidelity. Programmes such as the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (available in English, Spanish, Portuguese, and French), Vivifrail, Otago, Tai Chi for Arthritis, and PEARLS are described with specific training requirements, personnel needs, materials, and evidence base.
An appendix provides a toolkit for organisations planning adoption, covering readiness assessment, community leadership, logic models, quality improvement, and the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) for planning and evaluation. The portfolio stresses that programmes require structured training, fidelity to design, adequate budgeting for sustainability, and integration into primary care to be cost-effective.
Key points
For clinicians — doses and thresholds as stated in the guideline
- Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) is a 6-week, small-group workshop (10–14 participants, 2.5 hours/week) teaching problem-solving, action planning, and decision-making; peer leaders trained in a 4-day workshop facilitate sessions.
- Vivifrail is a 12-week individualised multicomponent exercise programme (30–45 minutes/day) for persons ≥70 years; prescription is based on a balance, walking speed, and chair-stand test, with four exercise passport levels (A for disability to D for robust).
- Otago Exercise Program comprises 17 strength and balance exercises done at home 3 times/week for 30 minutes plus walking 3 times/week for up to 30 minutes; delivered by trained physical therapists over 8 weeks with follow-up at 6 and 12 months.
- Enhance Fitness is a multi-component group class (1 hour, 3 times/week) including warm-up (5–9 minutes), cardiovascular workout (20 minutes), strength training (20 minutes), and flexibility/balance; outcomes tested every 4 months.
- PEARLS (Program to Encourage Active, Rewarding Lives) delivers 6–8 one-on-one sessions (50 minutes each) over 19 weeks using problem-solving therapy, behavioural activation, and pleasant activity scheduling, followed by monthly telephone follow-up for 3–6 months to manage depressive symptoms.
- Tai Chi for Arthritis/Fall Prevention consists of 1-hour classes twice weekly for 8 weeks teaching 6 basic and 6 advanced Sun-style Tai Chi movements with breathing techniques; certified instructors trained by master trainers.
- Evidence-based programmes require fidelity to design: structured training, scripted manuals, prescribed materials, and adherence to dosage (number and duration of sessions) to replicate proven outcomes.
- Approximately 80% of functional declines due to chronic conditions are preventable; 30% of community-dwelling adults ≥65 years and 50% of those ≥85 years fall at least once yearly, with 95% of hip fractures resulting from falls.
Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) delivery formats and requirements
Table extracted from the guideline
| Format | Duration | Target | Training | Materials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small group (in-person) | 6 weeks, 2.5 hours/week, 10–14 participants | Adults with ≥1 chronic condition | Peer leaders: 4-day workshop by certified master trainers | Leader manual, participant book (Living a Healthy Life), flip charts |
| Video platform (virtual) | 6 weeks, adapted CDSMP format | Adults with ≥1 chronic condition | Active CDSMP leaders with revised manual | All participants need webcam, Living Healthy book, 8–12 per workshop |
| Self-guided tool kit | Self-paced | Adults with ≥1 chronic condition | No leader required; participants must read independently | Living a Healthy Life book, relaxation CD, exercise CD, tip sheets |
| Tool kit + telephone | Self-paced + weekly calls | Adults with ≥1 chronic condition | Group leader for scripted calls to 4–6 participants | Tool kit materials + weekly conference calls |
Source: Pan American Health Organization, Portfolio: Evidence-based Programs for a Person-centered, Integrated Care for Older People at the Primary Health-care Level. Reproduced in summary form.
From the guideline
Verbatim
“Offering support for self-management is another tool for providing person-centered and integrated care to older adults.”
Editor’s perspective
Why this matters for Georgia and the region
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD
Editor-in-Chief, Georgian Medical Journal · Chair, Public Health Institute of Georgia · WHO consultant, health and migration
As we face rapid population ageing in Georgia and the South Caucasus—with chronic disease prevalence rising and health systems still heavily focused on acute care—this PAHO portfolio offers practical, proven tools we can adopt now. The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program, available in multiple languages and designed for peer leaders, is particularly feasible for our municipal health centres and community organisations; it addresses the gap between knowing what patients should do and empowering them with skills and confidence to actually do it. I would stress to Georgian colleagues the importance of fidelity: these programmes work because they have been rigorously tested with specific 'dosages' and methods, so local adaptation of language and examples is welcome, but changing the structure or skipping training will undermine outcomes. The realistic caveat is sustainability—initial training investment is only cost-effective if we budget for ongoing delivery, materials, and community partnerships; one-off pilot projects without integration into the UHC benefit package or municipal budgets will not achieve the population-level impact Georgia needs for healthy ageing.
ORCID 0000-0001-7609-4515 · Perspective written for the GMJ Guidelines Library, 18 Oct 2026
Applicability
Georgia and the South Caucasus
For Georgia and the South Caucasus, this portfolio is highly relevant given rapid population ageing (Georgia’s 65+ population projected to reach 20% by 2050) and high burden of noncommunicable diseases. The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program is available in multiple languages and has been adapted globally, making it feasible for implementation through Georgia’s primary health-care network and municipal health centres. Locomotor and falls-prevention programmes (Vivifrail, Otago) address the prevalence of osteoarthritis and fractures in the region, where home-based or community centre delivery can overcome rural access barriers. Depression management (PEARLS) is critical given underdiagnosis of mental health conditions in older adults. National programmes would need to plan for initial investment in training community health workers and peer leaders, secure sustainable funding for materials (books, exercise equipment), establish partnerships with senior centres and polyclinics, and integrate programmes into the Universal Health Care benefit package to ensure reach and maintenance.
Questions this guideline answers
Quick answers
What is the difference between an evidence-based programme and usual health education?
Evidence-based programmes have been tested in controlled trials, published in peer-reviewed journals, proven effective in real-world community settings, and provide standardised training, manuals, and materials. Usual health education often lacks this rigorous testing, structured delivery, and focus on behaviour-change skills and self-efficacy, not just knowledge.
How long do the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program sessions last and who leads them?
The small-group format meets once weekly for 2.5 hours over 6 weeks (total 15 hours), led by a pair of trained peer leaders who are usually community members with chronic conditions themselves, trained in a 4-day workshop by certified master trainers. Participants receive the book Living a Healthy Life with Chronic Conditions.
What are the key components of the Vivifrail exercise programme?
Vivifrail is a 12-week individualised multicomponent programme with 30–45 minutes of daily physical activity. It starts with a test of balance, walking speed, and chair stand to determine the appropriate exercise passport (type A for disability to type D for robust persons), prescribing specific strength, balance, and endurance exercises tailored to capacity.
Can community health workers deliver these programmes, or do they require clinical specialists?
Many programmes are designed for delivery by trained community health workers, peer leaders, or lay volunteers (e.g. CDSMP, Matter of Balance, Tai Chi for Arthritis). Some require health professionals or certified fitness instructors (e.g. Enhance Fitness, Otago by physical therapists, PEARLS by social workers with psychiatric supervision). Training and certification requirements are specified for each programme.
Related on GMJ
Interconnected resources
Dictionary of Public Health
Conditions A–Z
GMJ News coverage
- Magnesium deficiency linked to multiple chronic diseases: what clinicians need to knowAug 2026
- Magnesium Deficiency Linked to Multiple Chronic Diseases: What the Evidence ShowsAug 2026
- Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Stronger Predictor of Longevity Than Blood Pressure or CholesterolAug 2026
- Beyond Painkillers: A Complete Framework for Treating OsteoarthritisAug 2026
- Immune Drug Delays Rheumatoid Arthritis by Four Years After Treatment EndsJun 2026
Quality & accreditation
Other guidelines on this topic
- School Health Promotion in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Regional Assessment
- Tool for Promoting Culturally Safe Childbirth: Basic Manual
- Risk Communication and Community Engagement for Contact Tracing in the Context of COVID-19 in the Region of the Americas
- Guidelines for the Prophylaxis and Management of Patients with Non-severe COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean
- Essential care package to address mental health and stigma for persons with neglected tropical diseases
- Issuer
- Pan American Health Organization
- Type
- Procedures, manuals, guidelines
- Edition
- 2022
- Status
- Current
- Published
- 2022-01-01
- Languages
- English, Spanish, Portuguese, French (specific programmes vary)
- Scope
- Community-based and primary health-care programmes for older adults to improve intrinsic capacity
- Audience
- Primary care providers, community health workers, public health professionals, programme managers, caregivers
- Licence
- CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
- ISBN
- 978-92-75-12581-6 (pdf)
- Evidence
- Evidence-based programmes with published randomised controlled trials and effectiveness studies in peer-reviewed journals
- Record history
- Created 18 Oct 2026 · updated 18 Oct 2026 · next check Apr 2027
Pan American Health Organization. Portfolio: Evidence-based programs for person-centered, integrated care for older people at the primary health care level. Washington, DC: PAHO; 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37774/9789275125816GMJ Guidelines Library records are original summaries written by the GMJ editorial team from the issuer’s published document and reviewed by a physician. They do not replace the full guideline. The document is the copyright of its issuer and is linked, not hosted. Spotted an error or a newer edition? Tell the Guidelines Desk.
Was this article helpful?

