Medical residency programs should understand three critical findings from this NEJM analysis that reshape selection practices: virtual and in-person interview formats yield identical resident performance outcomes, eliminating any quality concerns about adopting digital selection methods. Second, virtual interviews substantially reduce financial barriers for applicants—eliminating $8,000-$15,000 in travel and preparation costs per candidate—thereby expanding the candidate pool and increasing socioeconomic diversity without compromising selection standards.
Third, these results suggest virtual interviews may represent the new standard in medical education. Current adoption patterns show 58 percent of programs favor hybrid models, 32 percent operate virtual-only, and only 10 percent maintain exclusively in-person formats. Programs can confidently implement or expand virtual components knowing they maintain selection accuracy and predictive validity.
For applicants, these findings indicate that interview format should not influence residency choice decisions, as selection quality remains equivalent regardless of modality. Programs and candidates can prioritize accessibility and cost-efficiency without quality trade-offs.
Read the full article on GMJ Newsroom.
Was this article helpful?
