World Health Organization · 6th edition, 2025 · 218 pages
WHO evidence-based guidance on the safety of contraceptive methods for women with specific medical conditions and personal characteristics.
- Issuer
- World Health Organization
- Edition
- 6th edition, 2025
- Audience
- Policy-makers, family planning programme managers, scientific community; intended as reference for national guideline adaptation, not direct clinical use
- Evidence
- GRADE-rated systematic reviews for 6 prioritized topics (breastfeeding & POCs, breastfeeding & IUDs, ART, PrEP, repeated ECPs, inflammatory bowel disease); ~2000 other recommendations from 5th edition reaffirmed through continuous evidence monitoring
- Reviewed
- 14 Oct 2026 · GMJ
What this guideline says
GMJ summary
This sixth edition of the WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria (MEC) provides evidence-based recommendations for safe use of contraceptive methods by women with various medical conditions and physiological characteristics. It employs a four-category classification system (1–4) indicating whether a method can be used without restriction, generally can be used, is usually not recommended, or represents an unacceptable health risk.
The guideline covers combined hormonal contraceptives (COCs ≤35 µg ethinyl estradiol, patch, vaginal ring, injectables), progestogen-only methods (pills, DMPA/NET-EN injectables, LNG/ETG implants), intrauterine devices (copper and levonorgestrel-releasing), emergency contraception, barrier methods, fertility-awareness-based methods, lactational amenorrhoea, and sterilization. Significant updates in this edition include revised recommendations for hormonal contraception during breastfeeding, use among women on antiretroviral therapy or HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, and repeated emergency contraceptive pill use.
The MEC is intended for national policy-makers and programme managers to adapt into country-specific guidelines, not for direct clinical application. It emphasizes that contraceptive choice must respect human rights, informed consent, and individual preferences, and that multiple risk factors may compound to change eligibility. The recommendations are based on systematic reviews using GRADE methodology, with the quality of evidence for most conditions rated as low or very low.
Key points
For clinicians — doses and thresholds as stated in the guideline
- Women < 6 weeks postpartum who are breastfeeding can generally use progestogen-only pills, LNG/ETG implants, and DMPA/NET-EN injectables (Category 2); at ≥ 6 weeks postpartum these become Category 1
- Women on efavirenz-containing ART can generally use CHCs, POPs, NET-EN and implants (Category 2); DMPA is Category 1 with efavirenz
- Women using HIV PrEP (tenofovir-emtricitabine, dapivirine ring, or cabotegravir) can use all hormonal contraceptives without restriction (Category 1)
- Emergency contraceptive pills (COCs, levonorgestrel, or ulipristal acetate) can be used more than once in a menstrual cycle without restriction (Category 1)
- Women with hypertension (systolic 140–159 or diastolic 90–99 mm Hg) should generally not use CHCs (Category 3); systolic ≥160 or diastolic ≥100 mm Hg is Category 4
- COC users who smoke ≥15 cigarettes/day and are ≥35 years old face unacceptable cardiovascular risk (Category 4); those smoking <15 cigarettes/day are Category 3
- Breastfeeding women < 48 hours postpartum can use Cu-IUD without restriction (Category 1) but LNG-IUD is Category 2; insertion at ≥48 hours to <4 weeks is Category 3 for both IUDs
- Women with history of venous thromboembolism, current ischaemic heart disease, stroke, or migraine with aura at any age should not use CHCs (Category 4)
MEC categories for contraceptive eligibility
Table extracted from the guideline
| Category | Definition | Interpretation with limited clinical resources |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A condition for which there is no restriction for the use of the contraceptive method | Use the method |
| 2 | A condition where the advantages of using the method generally outweigh the theoretical or proven risks | Use the method |
| 3 | A condition where the theoretical or proven risks usually outweigh the advantages of using the method | Do not use the method |
| 4 | A condition which represents an unacceptable health risk if the contraceptive method is used | Do not use the method |
Source: World Health Organization, Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 6th edition. Reproduced in summary form.
What changed in this edition
Versus the previous edition
- Recommendations for progestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: < 6 weeks postpartum changed from Category 3 to Category 2 for POPs, implants and POIs
- Recommendations for IUD use among breastfeeding women: LNG-IUD < 48 hours postpartum changed from Category 1 to Category 2
- New recommendations added for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) including tenofovir-emtricitabine, dapivirine ring, and cabotegravir – all Category 1 for hormonal contraceptives
- Antiretroviral therapy recommendations updated with specific guidance for NRTIs, NNRTIs (including efavirenz Category 2 for most hormonal methods except DMPA Category 1), protease inhibitors, and integrase inhibitors (raltegravir, dolutegravir)
- Emergency contraceptive pill use more than once in a menstrual cycle classified as Category 1 for COCs, levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate
- CYP3A4 inducers including anticonvulsants now listed as Category 1 for emergency contraceptive pills (previously unspecified)
From the guideline
Verbatim
“Women using PrEP can use all hormonal contraceptive methods without restriction (MEC Category 1).”
Editor’s perspective
Why this matters for Georgia and the region
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD
Editor-in-Chief, Georgian Medical Journal · Chair, Public Health Institute of Georgia · WHO consultant, health and migration
As editor of GMJ and a WHO consultant, I note this sixth MEC edition offers Georgian family planning services important updates that align with our evolving HIV and reproductive health programmes. The reclassification of progestogen-only methods to Category 2 for breastfeeding women in the first 6 weeks postpartum, and the explicit Category 1 designation for all hormonal contraceptives among women using HIV PrEP, will help clinicians counsel patients more confidently in these common scenarios. I would particularly emphasize to Georgian obstetricians and primary care physicians the nuanced antiretroviral drug interactions—efavirenz warrants Category 2 for most hormonal methods while newer integrase inhibitors are Category 1—distinctions critical as Georgia's HIV treatment programme matures. The practical caveat for Georgia is that successful implementation requires not only disseminating these categories but training mid-level providers to distinguish Category 2 (proceed with follow-up) from Category 3 (usually avoid unless no alternatives), a clinical judgement that presupposes both diagnostic capacity and continuity of care, infrastructure still developing in rural Georgian settings.
ORCID 0000-0001-7609-4515 · Perspective written for the GMJ Guidelines Library, 14 Oct 2026
Applicability
Georgia and the South Caucasus
Georgia’s national family planning programme will need to adapt these WHO criteria to local service-delivery contexts, considering the clinical competencies of different cadres of health workers and resource availability at primary, secondary and tertiary care levels. Particular attention should be given to the updated guidance on progestogen-only contraception during breastfeeding (now more permissive in the early postpartum period) and on hormonal contraception for women using antiretroviral therapy, relevant for Georgia’s HIV treatment programme. The recommendation that blood pressure measurement, while desirable before initiating CHCs, should not be an absolute barrier in settings where measurement is unavailable is especially pertinent for community-based and rural services. Georgian adaptation should specify which health worker cadres can apply Category 2 and 3 recommendations, and whether the simplified two-category system (Category 1–2 = eligible; Category 3–4 = not eligible) is appropriate for paramedical staff and community health workers in remote areas.
Questions this guideline answers
Quick answers
Can a breastfeeding woman start progestogen-only contraception in the first week after delivery?
Yes. Women < 6 weeks postpartum who are breastfeeding can generally use progestogen-only pills, levonorgestrel or etonogestrel implants, and DMPA or NET-EN injectables (Category 2). At ≥ 6 weeks postpartum these become Category 1 (no restrictions). Combined hormonal contraceptives remain Category 4 before 6 weeks postpartum in breastfeeding women.
Can a woman on efavirenz-based HIV treatment use combined oral contraceptives?
Generally yes, but with some concern (Category 2). Efavirenz may reduce contraceptive hormone levels and effectiveness. DMPA injectable is preferred (Category 1) for women on efavirenz. All other NNRTIs (etravirine, nevirapine, rilpivirine), NRTIs, protease inhibitors and integrase inhibitors are Category 1 for CHCs.
Is it safe for a woman to use emergency contraceptive pills multiple times in one menstrual cycle?
Yes. Use of emergency contraceptive pills (combined oral contraceptives, levonorgestrel or ulipristal acetate) more than once in a menstrual cycle is Category 1 (no restrictions). However, repeated use suggests the need for counselling about regular, more effective contraceptive methods.
At what blood pressure level should combined hormonal contraceptives be contraindicated?
CHCs are Category 4 (unacceptable health risk) when systolic blood pressure is ≥ 160 mm Hg or diastolic ≥ 100 mm Hg. When systolic is 140–159 or diastolic 90–99 mm Hg, CHCs are Category 3 (risks usually outweigh benefits). Adequately controlled hypertension is Category 3. Women with history of high blood pressure in pregnancy but current normal BP are Category 2.
Related on GMJ
Interconnected resources
Dictionary of Public Health
Conditions A–Z
GMJ News coverage
- Hypertension's Hidden Complexity: Why One-Size-Fits-All Treatment FailsOct 2026
- Primary aldosteronism: why screening for this overlooked cause of hypertension mattersSep 2026
- Hypertension in Bangladesh: wealth gap widens treatment divide, survey findsAug 2026
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants Show Promise Over Heparin in Cancer Blood Clots, New Analysis FindsJul 2026
Quality & accreditation
Other guidelines on this topic
- Recommendations on the management of sickle-cell disease during pregnancy, childbirth and the interpregnancy period
- Guidelines on lenacapavir for HIV prevention and testing strategies for long-acting injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis
- Recommendations on the delivery of health services for the prevention and care of sexually transmitted infections
- Abortion care guideline, 2nd edition
- Guideline on HIV service delivery: integration of diabetes, hypertension and mental health services, and adherence support interventions
- Issuer
- World Health Organization
- Type
- Guideline
- Edition
- 6th edition, 2025
- Replaces
- Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 5th edition, 2015
- Status
- Current
- Published
- 2025-10-30
- Languages
- English
- Scope
- All hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, barrier methods, fertility-awareness-based methods, lactational amenorrhoea, coitus interruptus, and male/female sterilization; addresses medical conditions and personal characteristics affecting safe contraceptive use
- Audience
- Policy-makers, family planning programme managers, scientific community; intended as reference for national guideline adaptation, not direct clinical use
- Pages
- 218
- Licence
- CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
- ISBN
- 978-92-4-011558-3
- Evidence
- GRADE-rated systematic reviews for 6 prioritized topics (breastfeeding & POCs, breastfeeding & IUDs, ART, PrEP, repeated ECPs, inflammatory bowel disease); ~2000 other recommendations from 5th edition reaffirmed through continuous evidence monitoring
- Next review
- 4 years (2029); interim updates if new evidence warrants reconsideration of existing recommendations
- Record history
- Created 14 Oct 2026 · updated 14 Oct 2026 · next check Apr 2027
Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, sixth edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.GMJ Guidelines Library records are original summaries written by the GMJ editorial team from the issuer’s published document and reviewed by a physician. They do not replace the full guideline. The document is the copyright of its issuer and is linked, not hosted. Spotted an error or a newer edition? Tell the Guidelines Desk.
Was this article helpful?

