World Health Organization · 2008 edition · 28 pages
WHO global strategy and consultation report on ensuring safe, sufficient blood supply from voluntary donors, quality-assured testing, and rational clinical use.
- Issuer
- World Health Organization
- Edition
- 2008 edition
- Audience
- National health authorities, blood transfusion services, clinicians, public health professionals
- Evidence
- Expert consensus from global consultation and country experiences
- Reviewed
- 23 Oct 2026 · GMJ
What this guideline says
GMJ summary
This report of a 2007 global consultation presents the WHO strategy for achieving universal access to safe blood transfusion worldwide. Globally, more than 100 million units of blood are donated annually, but less than 45% are collected in developing countries, home to 80% of the world’s population. The average donation rate is 10 times higher in high-income countries than in low-income countries. Of 73 countries with donation rates below 1% of the population in 2006, 70 are developing countries. Furthermore, 31 of 132 reporting countries (23.5%) have less than 100% screening for at least one of the four key infection markers (HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, syphilis).
The WHO strategy addresses five key areas: establishment of nationally-coordinated blood transfusion services; collection from voluntary non-remunerated blood donors from low-risk populations; quality-assured testing for transfusion-transmissible infections, blood grouping and compatibility; safe and appropriate use with reduction in unnecessary transfusions; and quality systems covering the entire transfusion process. By 2006, only 54 countries had achieved 100% voluntary unpaid blood donation. The consultation emphasized that haemorrhage accounts for up to 44% of maternal deaths in some areas of sub-Saharan Africa, and timely access to safe blood is a life-saving intervention.
The document outlines detailed recommendations to WHO, national health authorities, and blood transfusion services for strengthening blood safety infrastructure, donor programmes, testing systems, clinical transfusion practice, quality management, workforce development, and effective partnerships. It emphasizes integration of blood transfusion services with maternal and child health, HIV/AIDS, malaria and anaemia programmes to achieve the health-related Millennium Development Goals.
Key points
For clinicians — doses and thresholds as stated in the guideline
- Countries should aim for blood donation rates equivalent to 1–3% of the population to meet national blood transfusion requirements
- All donated blood must undergo 100% quality-assured screening for HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and syphilis using validated test kits with external quality assessment
- Voluntary non-remunerated blood donors from low-risk populations provide the safest blood; family/replacement and paid donors have higher infection rates
- National blood programmes should be governed by policy and legislation, with a nationally-coordinated structure replacing fragmented hospital-based services
- Hospital transfusion committees should be established in all hospitals performing transfusion, with >75% having operational committees as a target
- Evidence-based national guidelines on clinical transfusion should be developed and implemented to reduce unnecessary transfusions and promote blood conservation
- Haemovigilance systems must be established at national and regional levels for monitoring and improving transfusion safety with bi-directional traceability
- Blood transfusion is one of eight key life-saving interventions that should be available in first-referral level healthcare facilities providing emergency obstetric care
From the guideline
Verbatim
“The equivalent of 1–3% of the population should donate blood to meet a country's needs.”
Editor’s perspective
Why this matters for Georgia and the region
Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD
Editor-in-Chief, Georgian Medical Journal · Chair, Public Health Institute of Georgia · WHO consultant, health and migration
As WHO consultant on health and migration and Chair of Georgia's Public Health Institute, I recognize that safe blood transfusion is foundational infrastructure for our broader health system achievements—our hepatitis C elimination programme, universal health coverage launched in 2013, and maternal mortality reduction efforts all depend on it. The recommendation I would emphasize most to Georgian clinicians is the establishment of functional hospital transfusion committees in every facility performing transfusion, with authority to enforce evidence-based guidelines and conduct audits—this single measure addresses both safety and the unnecessary use that contributes to shortages. The realistic implementation challenge for Georgia and neighboring countries is that while we may achieve high screening rates through centralized testing, transitioning fully from family/replacement donation to 100% voluntary donation requires sustained community engagement, donor retention programmes like Club 25 for youth, and integration with educational institutions—cultural and logistical work that takes years, not just policy declarations.
ORCID 0000-0001-7609-4515 · Perspective written for the GMJ Guidelines Library, 23 Oct 2026
Applicability
Georgia and the South Caucasus
Georgia and South Caucasus countries face challenges common to transitional economies: ensuring sufficient blood supply from voluntary donors, maintaining quality-assured testing systems, and integrating blood transfusion services within broader health system reforms. Given Georgia’s successful implementation of its hepatitis C elimination programme (requiring safe blood supplies) and universal health coverage since 2013, strengthening blood transfusion services is essential infrastructure. The region’s maternal mortality reduction efforts, malaria elimination goals in some areas, and management of haemoglobinopathies (thalassaemia is present in the region) all depend critically on access to safe blood. National programmes would need to assess current donation rates (whether meeting the 1–3% of population target), verify 100% quality-assured screening for all four infection markers, transition away from any remaining family/replacement donation systems to 100% voluntary donation, establish hospital transfusion committees, and implement haemovigilance systems with full traceability from donor to recipient.
Questions this guideline answers
Quick answers
What donation rate should a country aim for to ensure adequate blood supply?
The equivalent of 1–3% of the population should donate blood annually to meet a country's transfusion needs. Donation rates below 1% of the population (fewer than 10 donations per 1000 people) indicate critical shortage, as seen in 73 countries in 2006, of which 70 were developing countries.
Why is voluntary unpaid donation safer than family/replacement or paid donation?
The prevalence of HIV, hepatitis viruses and other blood-borne infections is lowest among voluntary unpaid blood donors who give purely for altruistic reasons. Higher infection rates are found among family/replacement donors who give only when required by a patient's family, and the highest rates occur among paid donors. Only voluntary unpaid donors provide adequate stocks of safe blood regularly.
What are the minimum infection screening requirements for donated blood?
All donated blood must undergo 100% quality-assured screening for HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and syphilis. As of 2006, 31 countries (23.5% of 132 reporting) had less than 100% screening for at least one of these four markers, exposing recipients to avoidable life-threatening risks.
How does safe blood transfusion contribute to reducing maternal mortality?
Haemorrhage is the principal cause of maternal deaths worldwide, accounting for up to 44% of maternal deaths in some areas of sub-Saharan Africa and contributing to around 34% of maternal deaths in Africa, 31% in Asia, and 21% in Latin America and the Caribbean. Blood transfusion is one of eight key life-saving interventions that should be available in first-referral level facilities providing emergency obstetric care; timely access to safe blood can prevent many of these deaths.
Related on GMJ
Interconnected resources
Dictionary of Public Health
Conditions A–Z
GMJ News coverage
- PM2.5 pollution claims 2.95 million lives annually in BRICS nations, outpacing global averageSep 2026
- World-First Prenatal Surgery Saves Identical Twins from Life-Threatening Pregnancy ConditionOct 2026
- Malaria Prevention for Kenya Safari Travellers: The Full GuideOct 2026
- Malaria Prophylaxis for East African Safari Travellers: Evidence-Based PreventionOct 2026
ASF accreditation standards
Other guidelines on this topic
- Quality health services and palliative care: practical approaches and resources to support policy, strategy and practice
- Caring for those who care: Guide for the development and implementation of occupational health and safety programmes for health workers
- WASH FIT: A practical guide for improving quality of care through water, sanitation and hygiene in health care facilities, Second edition
- Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection, second edition
- Sustainable management of radiotherapy facilities and equipment
- Issuer
- World Health Organization
- Type
- Guideline
- Edition
- 2008 edition
- Status
- Current
- Published
- 2021-08-16
- Languages
- English
- Scope
- Global
- Audience
- National health authorities, blood transfusion services, clinicians, public health professionals
- Pages
- 28
- Evidence
- Expert consensus from global consultation and country experiences
- Record history
- Created 23 Oct 2026 · updated 23 Oct 2026 · next check Apr 2027
World Health Organization. Universal access to safe blood transfusion. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. 28 p. Report No.: WHO/EHT/08.03.GMJ Guidelines Library records are original summaries written by the GMJ editorial team from the issuer’s published document and reviewed by a physician. They do not replace the full guideline. The document is the copyright of its issuer and is linked, not hosted. Spotted an error or a newer edition? Tell the Guidelines Desk.
Was this article helpful?

