HomeTopics › Acupuncture

Acupuncture

GMJ News knowledge hub · last reviewed August 2026 · Georgian Medical Journal

SummaryStatisticsGlossaryGMJ newsFAQDocumentsOrganizationsResearch

Acupuncture — the insertion of fine sterile needles at specific body points — is the most evidence-supported of all complementary therapies, with NICE England recommending it as a treatment option for chronic primary pain (NG193, 2021) and for migraine prevention (NG218, 2021), and with multiple Cochrane systematic reviews demonstrating modest-to-moderate benefit for chronic low back pain, neck pain, knee osteoarthritis and headache disorders compared to no treatment or usual care (WHO TCIM Strategy 2025–2034). The scientific debate is not whether acupuncture works — but why it works: many high-quality trials show that sham acupuncture (needles placed at non-traditional sites, or non-penetrating placebo needles) performs similarly to real acupuncture — suggesting that non-specific effects (therapeutic encounter, expectation, cutaneous stimulation) may explain much of the benefit, while both substantially outperform no treatment or waiting-list controls.

Key messages

NICE-approved — chronic pain and migraine prevention
NICE England (NG193, 2021) recommends acupuncture as a treatment option for chronic primary pain. NICE (NG218, 2021) recommends acupuncture as a preventive treatment for migraine. These are the strongest regulatory endorsements any complementary therapy has received in any HIC health system.
Cochrane evidence — modest-to-moderate benefit vs no treatment
Multiple Cochrane systematic reviews confirm acupuncture outperforms no treatment, usual care and waiting-list controls for: chronic low back pain; neck pain; knee osteoarthritis; headache/migraine prevention; shoulder pain. Effect sizes are modest (SMD 0.3-0.5) but clinically meaningful for many patients.
The sham acupuncture debate — why it works matters
In many RCTs, sham acupuncture (needles at non-acupoints, or non-penetrating placebo needles) performs similarly to real acupuncture — yet both outperform no treatment. Interpretations: non-specific effects (therapeutic encounter, expectation, skin stimulation) explain benefit; acupoints may not be specific; or sham is not truly inert. The debate does not negate clinical benefit — but it challenges the traditional meridian framework.
Neurological mechanisms — endorphins and descending inhibition
Proposed mechanisms: endorphin and enkephalin release (blocked by naloxone, supporting opioidergic pathway); adenosine release at needle site; activation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC); descending serotonergic pain inhibition; connective tissue mechanotransduction (Langevin research). These are biologically plausible, though exact mechanisms remain debated.
Safety — excellent with properly trained practitioners
Serious adverse events are rare with trained practitioners using sterile single-use needles: pneumothorax from chest needling; spinal cord injury from cervical needling; infection — all very rare. Minor adverse events: bruising, soreness, vasovagal reactions are common. WHO endorses acupuncture as part of the TCIM strategy with safety and training standards.
Traditional basis — qi and meridians are not required
Traditional Chinese acupuncture is based on qi (life force) flowing through meridians (channels). No anatomical correlate for meridians has been demonstrated. However, accepting the traditional cosmological framework is NOT required to use acupuncture clinically — evidence-based acupuncture practice uses the needle technique regardless of theoretical explanation. A patient can benefit from acupuncture without believing in qi.

Key statistics

NICE NG193
acupuncture recommended for chronic primary pain (England, 2021)
NICE 2021
NICE NG218
acupuncture recommended for migraine prevention (England, 2021)
NICE 2021
Cochrane evidence
modest-to-moderate benefit for LBP, neck, OA, headache vs no treatment
Cochrane Library
Sham comparable
to real acupuncture in many RCTs — mechanism debate ongoing
Vickers et al. 2021
WHO TCIM
endorses acupuncture in TCIM Strategy 2025-2034 with safety/training standards
WHO 2025
Rare SAEs
serious adverse events rare with trained practitioners + sterile single-use needles
BMJ Safety

Acupuncture evidence quality by condition — Cochrane/NICE assessment

Source: Cochrane Reviews + NICE 2021. Evidence strongest for pain conditions; weakest for non-musculoskeletal claims.

Glossary of key terms

Meridians (jingluo)
TCM/History
The traditional Chinese concept of channels or pathways through which qi (life energy) flows throughout the body. 12 primary meridians and 8 extraordinary meridians connect acupuncture points (acupoints) to specific organs. No anatomical structure corresponding to meridians has been demonstrated on dissection, histology, imaging or electrophysiological study. Evidence-based acupuncture practitioners may use the point locations without accepting the meridian framework as a literal anatomical reality.
Sham acupuncture
Research methodology
Control conditions used in acupuncture RCTs to distinguish specific from non-specific effects: (1) Non-penetrating retractable sham needle (Streitberger needle): touches skin without penetrating — appears identical to real needle from patient perspective; (2) Needling at non-acupoints (places not traditionally used in acupuncture); (3) Superficial needling at acupoints (shorter needle, less stimulation); (4) Mock TENS/laser acupuncture. The finding that sham often performs similarly to real acupuncture does not mean acupuncture is merely placebo — sham conditions are not truly inert, and the comparison vs no treatment still shows benefit.
De qi sensation
TCM/Clinical
The characteristic sensation produced by correct needling in traditional acupuncture: a heavy, aching, distending, numb or electric feeling radiating from the needle site. Considered important in traditional practice for therapeutic effect. Some evidence that de qi sensation correlates with better outcomes; however, modern evidence-based protocols do not uniformly require de qi. The de qi sensation may correspond to activation of connective tissue mechanoreceptors and fascial planes (Langevin et al.).
DNIC (diffuse noxious inhibitory controls)
Neuroscience
A pain modulation mechanism where noxious stimulation in one body region inhibits pain in another — a "pain inhibits pain" phenomenon. Thought to involve activation of the periaqueductal grey (PAG) and serotonergic/noradrenergic descending pain inhibitory pathways. Acupuncture needling (itself a form of controlled noxious stimulation) may activate DNIC — providing a neurobiologically plausible mechanism for acupuncture analgesia that does not require meridian theory.
WHO TCIM Strategy 2025-2034
WHO 2025
The third WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy, covering 2025-2034 — building on the 2002-2005 and 2014-2023 strategies. Four pillars: (1) Harnessing the potential of TCIM; (2) Advancing knowledge and evidence; (3) Scaling up safe and quality TCIM practices; (4) Recognising the value of TCIM. WHO endorses integration of evidence-based TCIM into health systems — including acupuncture for pain and related conditions — while requiring safety, quality and practitioner training standards.
Acupuncture for fertility
Cochrane
A popular use — acupuncture around IVF embryo transfer. Cochrane 2018 (Cheong et al.): no evidence that acupuncture improves live birth rate in IVF, from 27 RCTs (5,765 women). This is one of the clearest examples where the evidence does NOT support a widely marketed use of acupuncture. Clinicians should advise patients that there is no reliable evidence that acupuncture improves IVF success rates.

Latest GMJ coverage

Articles will appear here as the archive grows.

Frequently asked questions 12 Q&A — structured for Google featured snippets and AI discovery

Knowledge hub: guidelines, conventions and reports

Organizations working in migration and health

Related health topics

Traditional medicine (overview)Chronic painLow back painMigraineTraditional Chinese medicineMindfulness (other NICE-approved CAM)

About this hub. Produced by the GMJ News Editorial Team as a public-good service. Every statistic is linked to its primary source. Documents are preserved in the GMJ Repository with full attribution. Georgian Medical Journal · Contact the editorial team
GMJ BriefsView all →