Home › Topics › Pelvic Floor Disorders
Pelvic Floor Disorders
GMJ News knowledge hub · last reviewed August 2026 · Georgian Medical Journal
SummaryStatisticsGlossaryGMJ newsFAQDocumentsOrganizationsResearch
Pelvic floor disorders — encompassing urinary incontinence (UI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and faecal incontinence — represent one of the most prevalent and most under-reported conditions in women: urinary incontinence affects approximately 50% of post-menopausal women and 25-45% of women overall, causing profound impact on quality of life, work participation, sexual function and mental health, yet only approximately 25% of affected women seek treatment due to stigma, normalisation (“it’s just part of being a woman”) and lack of awareness of effective treatments (WHO). Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) — Kegel exercises when correctly performed under physiotherapist supervision — is the first-line treatment with Grade A evidence for both stress and urgency urinary incontinence, reducing episodes by approximately 50-60% when performed correctly and consistently, and represents one of the clearest examples of a highly effective, zero-cost, zero-side-effect intervention being systematically underutilised.
Key messages
50% of post-menopausal women — the silent epidemic
Urinary incontinence (UI) affects approximately 25-45% of women overall and approximately 50% of post-menopausal women — making it one of the most prevalent conditions in women globally. Yet fewer than 25% of affected women seek treatment, due to stigma and the false belief that incontinence is an inevitable consequence of ageing or childbirth.
Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) — Grade A evidence, first-line for all UI types
Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT, "Kegel exercises") correctly performed and supervised by a pelvic floor physiotherapist has Grade A evidence for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) and mixed UI — reducing episodes by approximately 50-60% in most trials. The key word is "correctly": most women who have tried Kegels are doing them incorrectly (contracting abdominals or glutes instead of the pelvic floor). Physiotherapist supervision with real-time ultrasound or biofeedback dramatically improves outcomes.
Three types of urinary incontinence — different treatments
Stress UI (SUI, most common): leakage with coughing, laughing, sneezing, exercise — from urethral sphincter weakness and poor bladder neck support. First-line: PFMT. Second-line: midurethral slings (tension-free vaginal tape — TVT, or transobturator tape — TOT). Urgency UI (UUI): sudden strong urge, leakage before reaching the toilet — overactive bladder (OAB) driving urge incontinence. First-line: PFMT + bladder training + antimuscarinics (solifenacin, oxybutynin) or mirabegron (beta-3 agonist — fewer anticholinergic side effects). Mixed: both components; PFMT first.
Pelvic organ prolapse — the grade and symptom matter
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP): descent of the pelvic organs (bladder — cystocele; rectum — rectocele; uterus — uterine prolapse; vaginal vault after hysterectomy) through the vaginal introitus. Most common in post-menopausal women, multiparous women and after vaginal delivery. Graded 0-IV (POP-Q staging). Treatment: observation for asymptomatic or minor prolapse; pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFMT); vaginal pessary (ring, Gehrung, shelf pessaries — non-surgical, highly effective first-line treatment); surgical repair (native tissue or mesh — mesh safety controversy).
Faecal incontinence — the most taboo symptom
Faecal incontinence (FI) — involuntary loss of gas or liquid or solid stool — affects approximately 7-15% of adults and up to 30-40% of patients in primary care settings when systematically asked. The most common unasked symptom in clinical practice. Causes: obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI — 3rd and 4th degree tears); IBS; diarrhoea; rectal prolapse; neurological (MS, pudendal neuropathy). Treatment: dietary modification; loperamide; PFMT (improves sphincter function and rectal sensation); biofeedback; sacral nerve stimulation (SNS/neuromodulation — highly effective); anal sphincter repair.
Pelvic mesh controversy — patient safety history
Synthetic mesh devices implanted vaginally for SUI and POP repair were associated with serious complications: erosion through vaginal walls; chronic pain; dyspareunia; nerve damage; difficulty removing. The UK review (2018 Cumberlege Report) found mesh products were introduced without adequate safety evaluation. UK: routine use of transvaginal mesh for POP was suspended (2018); SUI mesh maintained with restrictions. Australia: several mesh products withdrawn. FDA: multiple warnings and final order for surgical mesh manufacturers to conduct post-market studies. The mesh debate underscores the need for rigorous implant device safety evaluation.
Key statistics
Urinary incontinence — treatment pathway by type (NICE/ICS)
Glossary of key terms
Latest GMJ coverage
Frequently asked questions 12 Q&A — structured for Google featured snippets and AI discovery
Knowledge hub: guidelines, conventions and reports
Organizations working in migration and health
Related health topics
Menopause (GSM, prolapse risk)Women's healthUterine conditionsObesity (PFD risk)Ageing (PFD prevalence)UTI (OAB differential)
About this hub. Produced by the GMJ News Editorial Team as a public-good service. Every statistic is linked to its primary source. Documents are preserved in the GMJ Repository with full attribution. Georgian Medical Journal · Contact the editorial team


