Chiropractic
GMJ News knowledge hub · last reviewed August 2026 · Georgian Medical Journal
SummaryStatisticsGlossaryGMJ newsFAQDocumentsOrganizationsResearch
Chiropractic — founded by D.D. Palmer in 1895 on the theory that spinal “subluxations” cause disease by impinging on nerves — has evolved into a profession with a significant evidence base for musculoskeletal conditions: NICE England lists spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) as a treatment option for chronic low back and neck pain, and Cochrane systematic reviews confirm SMT is comparable in effectiveness to physiotherapy and other active treatments for these conditions (WHO). However, a critical safety issue requires clear disclosure: cervical (neck) manipulation is associated with vertebral artery dissection (VAD) and posterior circulation stroke — estimated at approximately 1 in 20,000–120,000 cervical manipulations — and informed consent discussion of this risk, however rare, is mandatory before any cervical manipulation procedure, particularly in young patients presenting with new neck pain.
Key messages
Evidence for LBP and neck pain — NICE lists it as an option
NICE England lists spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) as one of several treatment options for chronic low back and neck pain, alongside physiotherapy and acupuncture. Cochrane systematic reviews confirm SMT is comparable (not superior or inferior) to physiotherapy, exercise and other active treatments for these conditions.
Cervical manipulation and vertebral artery dissection — must be disclosed
Cervical (neck) manipulation is associated with vertebral artery dissection (VAD) leading to posterior circulation stroke. Risk estimates: approximately 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 120,000 cervical manipulations. Causation vs temporal coincidence is debated, but pre-manipulation informed consent discussion of this risk — however small — is mandatory. A young patient presenting with new-onset neck pain after a motor vehicle accident who subsequently strokes is a recognised medico-legal scenario.
Modern vs vitalist chiropractic — a spectrum within one profession
Evidence-based chiropractors (the majority) focus on spinal manipulation for musculoskeletal conditions, using the same outcome measures as physiotherapy. Vitalist chiropractors retain D.D. Palmer's original theory of "vertebral subluxations" causing systemic disease by impinging spinal nerves — and claim chiropractic treats asthma, otitis media, ADHD, colic and other non-musculoskeletal conditions. No peer-reviewed evidence supports these claims. The profession is internally divided.
The subluxation theory — the original basis, not supported by science
D.D. Palmer's 1895 founding theory: misaligned vertebrae ("subluxations") compress spinal nerves, disrupting vital force flow and causing disease throughout the body. No scientific evidence supports the existence of pathological subluxations as originally defined, or the claim that spinal adjustment cures or prevents systemic disease beyond musculoskeletal pain. Most national chiropractic associations have moved away from subluxation theory; some practitioners still use it.
What chiropractic does NOT have evidence for
No reliable evidence for chiropractic treatment of: asthma; otitis media (ear infections); colic; ADHD; hypertension; immune function; or any condition other than musculoskeletal pain syndromes. Parents should be aware that infant/child chiropractic — particularly for colic or ear infections — has no evidence base and carries a risk of serious injury in young children (cervical manipulation in infants has caused strokes and death in case reports).
Scope of practice and the physiotherapy comparison
Evidence-based chiropractic for musculoskeletal conditions (LBP, neck pain, some headache) is clinically comparable to physiotherapy/physical therapy. The outcome evidence does not demonstrate superiority of chiropractic over physiotherapy for any musculoskeletal condition. Both are reasonable options for chronic LBP and neck pain where active treatment is preferred.
Key statistics
1 in 20K–120K
estimated VAD (vertebral artery dissection) risk per cervical manipulation
Haldeman/BoyleChiropractic evidence by condition — Cochrane/NICE assessment
Glossary of key terms
Latest GMJ coverage
Articles will appear here as the archive grows.
Frequently asked questions 12 Q&A — structured for Google featured snippets and AI discovery
Knowledge hub: guidelines, conventions and reports
Organizations working in migration and health
Related health topics
Low back pain (#1 disability globally)Musculoskeletal healthAcupuncture (NICE-listed alternative)Traditional medicineExercise for musculoskeletal healthOsteoporosis (SMT contraindicated)
About this hub. Produced by the GMJ News Editorial Team as a public-good service. Every statistic is linked to its primary source. Documents are preserved in the GMJ Repository with full attribution. Georgian Medical Journal · Contact the editorial team

